Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Length of reply message #721

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Length of reply message #721

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Gamius00
Copy link
Collaborator

@Gamius00 Gamius00 commented Nov 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced readability of reply messages by truncating long content to 20 characters with an ellipsis.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Maintained existing functionality for handling various message types and interactions.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 20, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
chat-io ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 20, 2024 4:54pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily modify the ReplyToMessage and Message components within the application. The ReplyToMessage component now truncates long messages to a maximum of 20 characters, appending an ellipsis for overflow. Correspondingly, the Message component's rendering logic has been updated to accommodate this truncation behavior. While the overall structure and existing functionalities of both components remain intact, these adjustments enhance the readability of reply messages.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/components/message.tsx Modified ReplyToMessage to truncate replyTo.content to 20 characters with ellipsis. Updated Message rendering logic to reflect new truncation behavior while maintaining existing functionalities.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: reply functionality #676: The changes in this PR enhance the reply functionality, which is directly related to the modifications made in the ReplyToMessage component and the overall handling of replies in the main PR.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow, messages fly,
Truncated tales, oh my!
Twenty characters, neat and sweet,
With ellipses, they can't be beat!
Hopping along, we share and reply,
A clearer chat, oh me, oh my! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/message.tsx (1)

Line range hint 428-432: Enhance reply message interaction features

While the truncation works, the copy functionality should ensure it copies the full message content, not the truncated version.

Consider updating the copy handler:

                          onClick={() => {
-                            void navigator.clipboard.writeText(message.content);
+                            const fullContent = message.type === "message" && message.replyTo 
+                              ? message.replyTo.content 
+                              : message.content;
+                            void navigator.clipboard.writeText(fullContent);
                            setIsModalOpen(!isModalOpen);
                            toast.success("Copied to clipboard");
                          }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 37a0370 and b7a8c83.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/message.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/message.tsx (1)

50-52: Verify truncation impact across the codebase

Let's ensure the truncation doesn't affect other features or tests.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try with corrected file type flags for ripgrep.


Let me try one more time with simpler commands and without file type flags.


Truncation implementation is isolated and safe

The truncation of reply message content is only used in this single location within src/components/message.tsx for display purposes. There are no other usages of replyTo.content across the codebase, and no test files would be affected by this change.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of reply message content
echo "Checking for other usages of reply message content..."
rg -l "replyTo.*content" --type typescript --type tsx

# Search for related test files
echo "Checking for related test files..."
fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts message

Length of output: 345


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of reply message content
echo "Checking for other usages of reply message content..."
rg -l "replyTo.*content" -t ts -t tsx

# Search for test files and show their content
echo "Checking for related test files..."
fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts message -x cat {}

Length of output: 334


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of reply message content
echo "Searching for replyTo.content usage..."
rg "replyTo.*content"

# List and show content of message-related test files
echo "Looking for message-related test files..."
find . -type f -name "*message*test*" -o -name "*message*spec*"

Length of output: 495

Comment on lines +50 to +52
{message.replyTo.content.length < 20
? message.replyTo.content
: `${message.replyTo.content.slice(0, 20)}...`}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance message truncation implementation

The current implementation has several areas for improvement:

  1. The character limit is hard-coded
  2. The truncation might not handle multi-byte characters or emojis correctly
  3. Missing accessibility considerations for screen readers

Consider this improved implementation:

-          {message.replyTo.content.length < 20
-            ? message.replyTo.content
-            : `${message.replyTo.content.slice(0, 20)}...`}
+          <span title={message.replyTo.content}>
+            {message.replyTo.content.length <= MAX_REPLY_LENGTH
+              ? message.replyTo.content
+              : `${message.replyTo.content.slice(0, MAX_REPLY_LENGTH)}…`}
+          </span>

Add this constant at the top of the file:

const MAX_REPLY_LENGTH = 20; // Maximum length for reply message preview

The improvements include:

  • Using a named constant for better maintainability
  • Adding a title attribute for accessibility
  • Using proper ellipsis character (…)
  • Wrapping in a span for better semantic structure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant