Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Do not run checkov against subcharts #297

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ppawlowski
Copy link
Contributor

@ppawlowski ppawlowski commented Feb 5, 2024

Description

This PR excludes sub-charts from the checkov scanning step in the Helm chart validation workflow.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
  • Documentation has been updated
    • Upgrade instructions
    • Configuration details
    • Concepts
  • Changes flowforge.yml?
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/helm to update ConfigMap Template
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/CloudProject to update values for Staging/Production

Labels

  • Backport needed? -> add the backport label
  • Includes a DB migration? -> add the area:migration label

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-amd64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-amd64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

file-server:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-arm64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-arm64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

file-server:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 6218292. ± Comparison against base commit c1bb99e.

@ppawlowski ppawlowski marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2024 19:55
@ppawlowski ppawlowski requested a review from hardillb February 5, 2024 19:55
@hardillb hardillb merged commit 9e2a821 into main Feb 6, 2024
43 checks passed
@hardillb hardillb deleted the fix-checkov-helm-subcharts branch February 6, 2024 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants