Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: swap MMU_EJECT to MMU_UNLOAD #671

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ammmze
Copy link
Contributor

@ammmze ammmze commented Nov 6, 2024

In the upcoming Happy Hare v3, eject behaves slightly different for "Type B" MMU's, where it ejects the spool out of the MMU where unload just retracts and parks it.

In Happy Hare v2, MMU_EJECT and MMU_UNLOAD ran the same code, so they are interchangeable in v2.

In the upcoming Happy Hare v3, eject behaves slightly different for "Type B" MMU's, where it ejects the spool out of the MMU where unload just retracts and parks it.

In Happy Hare v2, `MMU_EJECT` and `MMU_UNLOAD` ran the same code, so they are interchangeable in v2.
Copy link

@Zchulski Zchulski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code changes seem look okay and manually adding the changed files results in propert operation

Copy link

@ningpj ningpj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Change required due to new behaviour of mmu_eject command implemented for type-b mmus.

Copy link

@cdedwards cdedwards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need this added

@dpeart
Copy link

dpeart commented Jan 2, 2025

Is it possible to get this merged soon? I just spent ~20 hours debugging this.

@Frix-x Frix-x merged commit 635d62a into Frix-x:main Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants