♻️ refactor(units): consolidate abstracts

[nstarman]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.48%. Comparing base (9b6b495) to head (af6720e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #374      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.48%   97.48%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          45       45              
  Lines        1593     1591       -2     
  Branches      317      316       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1553     1551       -2     
  Misses         33       33              
  Partials        7        7              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nstarman]

@meeseeksdev backport to versions/v1.0.x

[lumberbot-app]

Owee, I'm MrMeeseeks, Look at me.

There seem to be a conflict, please backport manually. Here are approximate instructions:

1. Checkout backport branch and update it.

git checkout versions/v1.0.x
git pull

2. Cherry pick the first parent branch of the this PR on top of the older branch:

git cherry-pick -x -m1 53cdf12fc5ebaace4e4378a1e224eaf096bd6fc2

3. You will likely have some merge/cherry-pick conflict here, fix them and commit:

git commit -am 'Backport PR #374: ♻️ refactor(units): consolidate abstracts'

4. Push to a named branch:

git push YOURFORK versions/v1.0.x:auto-backport-of-pr-374-on-versions/v1.0.x

5. Create a PR against branch versions/v1.0.x, I would have named this PR:

"Backport PR #374 on branch versions/v1.0.x (♻️ refactor(units): consolidate abstracts)"

And apply the correct labels and milestones.

Congratulations — you did some good work! Hopefully your backport PR will be tested by the continuous integration and merged soon!

Remember to remove the Still Needs Manual Backport label once the PR gets merged.

If these instructions are inaccurate, feel free to suggest an improvement.