handle removed project with vouch #120
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@MohammadPCh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a conditional block in the project deletion process within the code. When the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/features/import-projects/helpers.ts (2)
64-64: Improve clarity of the commentConsider rephrasing the comment for better readability.
Apply this diff:
-// make project as not imported if failed to delete because it may have some vouches +// Mark project as not imported if deletion fails, as it may have existing vouches
52-78: Consider using transactions to ensure data consistencyWhen performing multiple database operations that are dependent on each other, wrapping them in a transaction can help maintain data integrity.
Consider refactoring the code to use a transaction, like so:
await dataSource.transaction(async (manager) => { try { // Attempt to delete the project await manager .createQueryBuilder() .delete() .from(Project) .where("id = :id", { id }) .execute(); console.log( `[${new Date().toISOString()}] - INFO: Project Deleted. Project ID: ${id}` ); } catch (error) { // Update the project's imported status console.log( `[${new Date().toISOString()}] - ERROR: Failed to delete project. Project ID: ${id}. Error: ${error.message}` ); const updatedProject = new Project({ ...existingProject, imported: false, }); await manager .createQueryBuilder() .update(Project) .set(updatedProject) .where("id = :id", { id }) .execute(); } });This way, if any operation within the transaction fails, the entire transaction is rolled back, ensuring consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/features/import-projects/helpers.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/features/import-projects/helpers.ts
[error] 51-51: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/features/import-projects/helpers.ts (1 hunks)
- src/features/import-projects/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/features/import-projects/helpers.ts
[error] 51-51: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/features/import-projects/index.ts (4)
14-16: Address the TODO comment and clarify the update plan.There's a TODO comment indicating that
fetchRFProjectsByRound(5)will be filled on September 20th. Given that this PR was opened after that date:
- Has this TODO been addressed? If so, please update or remove the comment.
- If not, what's the current plan for implementing this function call?
Additionally, it's worth noting that
fetchAndProcessRlProjects(5)is still active. Is this intentional, or should it also be commented out for consistency with the other import functions?
Line range hint
1-37: Clarify the PR title and description in relation to the code changes.The PR title "handle removed project with vouch" doesn't seem to align with the changes made in this file. The modifications appear to be related to disabling certain project import functions rather than handling removed projects or vouching.
Could you please clarify:
- How do these changes relate to handling removed projects with vouch?
- Are there other files in this PR that implement the functionality mentioned in the title?
- If this PR's scope has changed, consider updating the title and description to accurately reflect the current changes.
Let's check if there are other files in this PR that might be related to the PR title:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for files that might be related to handling removed projects or vouching # Test: Search for relevant keywords. Expect: Files or code related to project removal or vouching. echo "Searching for files related to project removal:" rg --type typescript '(remove|delete).*project' echo "Searching for files related to vouching:" rg --type typescript 'vouch'
Line range hint
19-37: Consider the impact oftaskfunction changes onimportProjectsWhile the
importProjectsfunction itself remains unchanged, the modifications to thetaskfunction it calls will affect its behavior:
- The cron job set up by
importProjectswill now run ataskwith fewer active import functions.- The immediate call to
task()at the end ofimportProjectswill no longer execute the commented-out import functions.Ensure that these changes align with the intended behavior of the import process. If certain import functions are meant to be temporarily disabled, consider adding a comment in
importProjectsto indicate this change in behavior.Let's check if
importProjectsis called elsewhere in the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for calls to importProjects function # Test: Search for function calls. Expect: Locations where importProjects is invoked. rg --type typescript 'importProjects\(\)'
11-14: Clarify the purpose of commenting out import functions and consider alternatives.Several project import functions have been commented out:
fetchAndProcessGivethProjects()fetchAndProcessGitcoinProjects()fetchRFProjectsByRound(4)While this might be intentional for debugging or testing purposes, commenting out code is not ideal for long-term maintainability. Consider the following alternatives:
- Use feature flags or configuration options to enable/disable specific import sources.
- If these are temporary changes, use version control branches instead of committing commented code.
Could you please clarify the reasoning behind these changes and whether they are intended to be permanent?
To understand the impact of these changes, let's check for any dependencies on these commented functions:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No External Dependencies Found for Commented-Out Import Functions
The following functions have no active calls outside
src/features/import-projects/index.ts:
fetchAndProcessGivethProjects()fetchAndProcessGitcoinProjects()fetchRFProjectsByRound()While commenting out these functions is currently safe, consider using feature flags or configuration options to manage such changes for better long-term maintainability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for dependencies on the commented-out functions # Test: Search for function calls. Expect: No active calls to these functions outside this file. echo "Checking for calls to fetchAndProcessGivethProjects:" rg --type typescript 'fetchAndProcessGivethProjects' --glob '!src/features/import-projects/index.ts' echo "Checking for calls to fetchAndProcessGitcoinProjects:" rg --type typescript 'fetchAndProcessGitcoinProjects' --glob '!src/features/import-projects/index.ts' echo "Checking for calls to fetchRFProjectsByRound:" rg --type typescript 'fetchRFProjectsByRound' --glob '!src/features/import-projects/index.ts'Length of output: 603
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for dependencies on the commented-out functions without using --type typescript echo "Checking for calls to fetchAndProcessGivethProjects:" rg 'fetchAndProcessGivethProjects' --glob '**/*.ts' --glob '!src/features/import-projects/index.ts' echo "Checking for calls to fetchAndProcessGitcoinProjects:" rg 'fetchAndProcessGitcoinProjects' --glob '**/*.ts' --glob '!src/features/import-projects/index.ts' echo "Checking for calls to fetchRFProjectsByRound'" rg 'fetchRFProjectsByRound' --glob '**/*.ts' --glob '!src/features/import-projects/index.ts'Length of output: 1185
src/features/import-projects/helpers.ts (4)
48-50: LGTM: Proper handling of project removalThe new conditional block correctly checks for the "Remove" condition before proceeding with project deletion. This is a good practice for explicit case handling.
85-86: LGTM: Proper function exitThe
returnstatement correctly exits the function after handling the project removal case, preventing unnecessary execution of the remaining code.
Line range hint
1-86: Overall assessment: Good feature implementation with minor improvements neededThe new feature for handling removed projects is well-integrated into the existing
updateOrCreateProjectfunction. It properly checks for the removal condition and attempts to delete the project from the database when necessary. The error handling for failed deletions is a good addition, updating the project's imported status as a fallback.However, there are a few areas where the code can be further improved:
- Use of optional chaining for more concise code.
- Enhanced error logging to include error details.
- Improved error handling for the update operation when setting a project as un-imported.
Implementing these suggestions will result in more robust and maintainable code. Overall, the changes are a positive addition to the project's functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 51-51: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
65-67: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error logging with error details
Including the error details in your log message helps with troubleshooting.
Apply this diff:
console.log( - `[${new Date().toISOString()}] - ERROR: Failed to delete project. Project ID: ${id}` + `[${new Date().toISOString()}] - ERROR: Failed to delete project. Project ID: ${id}. Error: ${error.message}` );Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| try { | ||
| await dataSource | ||
| .createQueryBuilder() | ||
| .update(Project) | ||
| .set(updatedProject) | ||
| .where("id = :id", { id }) | ||
| .execute(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.log( | ||
| `[${new Date().toISOString()}] - ERROR: Failed to make project un-imported. Project ID: ${id}` | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling for project update operation
The current implementation lacks proper error handling for the update operation when setting the project's imported status to false. This could lead to silent failures and inconsistent state.
Consider wrapping the update operation in a try-catch block and handling the error appropriately. Here's a suggested implementation:
try {
await dataSource
.createQueryBuilder()
.update(Project)
.set(updatedProject)
.where("id = :id", { id })
.execute();
console.log(
`[${new Date().toISOString()}] - INFO: Project marked as un-imported. Project ID: ${id}`
);
} catch (updateError) {
console.log(
`[${new Date().toISOString()}] - ERROR: Failed to make project un-imported. Project ID: ${id}. Error: ${updateError.message}`
);
// Consider additional error handling or recovery steps here
}This change will provide better visibility into the success or failure of the update operation and allow for more robust error handling.
| `[${new Date().toISOString()}] - INFO: Project Deleted. Project ID: ${id}` | ||
| ); | ||
| // If project is imported, delete it from the database | ||
| if (existingProject && existingProject.imported) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify condition using optional chaining
You can simplify the condition by using optional chaining for cleaner and more concise code.
Apply this diff:
-if (existingProject && existingProject.imported) {
+if (existingProject?.imported) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (existingProject && existingProject.imported) { | |
| if (existingProject?.imported) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 51-51: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Summary by CodeRabbit