Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add general investment variables #170

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

danielhuppmann
Copy link
Member

This PR adds variables suggested by @gunnar-pik related to general investment. including adding tiers to already-existing variables.

@danielhuppmann danielhuppmann requested a review from a team October 17, 2024 19:23
@danielhuppmann danielhuppmann self-assigned this Oct 17, 2024
@FlorianLeblancDr
Copy link
Contributor

Second comment : my problem with the infrastructure variable is that energy supply is part of the infrastruture in some definitions (https://outlook.gihub.org/)

So may be :

  • rename as "Non-energy infrastructure" and be explicit about the list of infrastrucutre we are talking about ? (Water, Transport, Télécommunications)

@gunnar-pik
Copy link

Having second thoughts about Investment|Energy Efficiency: These are clearly part of Energy Demand, and should therefore be part of the substructure of Investment|Energy Demand|.... For Buildings, for instance, they might be part of retrofits. So I think we can simply leave the high-level Investment|Energy Efficiency variable away

@danielhuppmann
Copy link
Member Author

@gunnar-pik, I'm confused about your comment regarding energy-efficiency investment - this is not part of this PR.

Should I go ahead and merge the two variables in this PR: forestry-investment and infrastructure-investment, or do we need a more in-depth discussion about energy-supply-infrastructure versus other infrastructure?

@gunnar-pik
Copy link

You're right, please go ahead with the merge.
We can revisit the issue on energy efficiency investments when we add additional investments for the demand side.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants