Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix:binarization_protocol #53

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

fix:binarization_protocol #53

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Jan 3, 2025

handling typing correctly

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved message handling in the message bus client
    • Enhanced message type processing and serialization
    • Implemented more robust message parsing and emission logic

handling typing correctly
@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Jan 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the on_message method in the HiveMessageBusClient class, enhancing message handling logic. The changes introduce a more robust approach to processing different message types, including HiveMessage instances, strings, and dictionaries. The method now includes conditional checks to serialize, emit, and process messages appropriately, ensuring consistent handling across various input types while maintaining the core message bus functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
hivemind_bus_client/client.py Updated on_message method with type-specific message handling logic:
- Added conditional checks for message types
- Implemented serialization for HiveMessage instances
- Maintained support for string and dictionary messages
- Removed direct raw message emission

Possibly related issues

  • Follow-up requested by JarbasAl #51 (JarbasHiveMind/hivemind-websocket-client): While the details are sparse, the issue seems to be related to a follow-up request that might involve message handling improvements, which aligns with the current PR's changes.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Message Mastery 🚀

In bytes and strings, a message flows,
Through conditional checks, its pathway grows
Serialized, parsed with utmost care
HiveMind's protocol beyond compare!

Code hops, messages dance with glee! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
hivemind_bus_client/client.py (2)

301-303: Guard against JSON parsing errors.
When handling string messages (lines 302–303), consider wrapping json.loads(message) in a try-except block. Malformed JSON could raise a JSONDecodeError, which should be gracefully handled, possibly logging a warning or error.

-    self._handle_hive_protocol(HiveMessage(**json.loads(message)))
+    try:
+        parsed_data = json.loads(message)
+        self._handle_hive_protocol(HiveMessage(**parsed_data))
+    except json.JSONDecodeError:
+        LOG.warning("Received invalid JSON string.")

297-307: Potentially unify or simplify the conditional checks.
The current block checks for HiveMessage, str, and then assumes a dict for all else. If messages are always one of these three types, consider refactoring to a more centralized or pattern-matching approach (where available) to improve readability and maintainability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 445be9f and 358d275.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • hivemind_bus_client/client.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
hivemind_bus_client/client.py (1)

299-300: Consider verifying the serialized output.
Currently, the code assumes that message.serialize() will produce valid JSON-serializable data. If HiveMessage.serialize() ever returns invalid data, it may lead to downstream issues. Consider adding more robust checks or exception handling around the serialization if the data is untrusted or can become corrupted.

Comment on lines +304 to +307
else:
assert isinstance(message, dict)
self.emitter.emit('message', json.dumps(message, ensure_ascii=False)) # raw message
self._handle_hive_protocol(HiveMessage(**message))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Validate dictionary content before constructing a HiveMessage.
Here, we assert that message is a dictionary and then immediately unpack it into a HiveMessage. Consider adding checks or error handling to ensure the dictionary has the correct structure and required fields (e.g., “msg_type”/“payload”) before converting it into a HiveMessage.

-assert isinstance(message, dict)
-self.emitter.emit('message', json.dumps(message, ensure_ascii=False))
-self._handle_hive_protocol(HiveMessage(**message))
+if isinstance(message, dict):
+    if "payload" not in message or "msg_type" not in message:
+        LOG.warning("Invalid message structure: missing required fields.")
+    else:
+        self.emitter.emit('message', json.dumps(message, ensure_ascii=False))
+        self._handle_hive_protocol(HiveMessage(**message))
+else:
+    LOG.warning("Expected a dictionary but got something else.")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
else:
assert isinstance(message, dict)
self.emitter.emit('message', json.dumps(message, ensure_ascii=False)) # raw message
self._handle_hive_protocol(HiveMessage(**message))
else:
if isinstance(message, dict):
if "payload" not in message or "msg_type" not in message:
LOG.warning("Invalid message structure: missing required fields.")
else:
self.emitter.emit('message', json.dumps(message, ensure_ascii=False))
self._handle_hive_protocol(HiveMessage(**message))
else:
LOG.warning("Expected a dictionary but got something else.")

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit bcb2d1f into dev Jan 3, 2025
3 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the fix/binarization_protocol branch January 8, 2025 21:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant