Experiment: default IDs in LUT references #81
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ostrzyciel
added a commit
to Jelly-RDF/jelly-rdf.github.io
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2024
Update the spec to be up-to-date with these changes: - Jelly-RDF/jelly-jvm#83 - Jelly-RDF/jelly-jvm#82 - Jelly-RDF/jelly-jvm#81 - Jelly-RDF/jelly-jvm#80
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Somewhat related to the last PR: #80
This time I'm changing up the meaning of the default values for references to the lookup tables (not the lookup table entries). Previously for the name and prefix tables, a value of 0 meant "empty string" which is not a very useful thing, this occurs rarely. They both now have a funky repeating behavior that should help with some common patterns in RDF.
For datatypes I've also implemented this, but now I've realized this will conflict with another optimization I want to do later... so I'll probably revert it.