Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Permitting rhs properties in filters (2) #178

Conversation

sauliusg
Copy link
Contributor

@sauliusg sauliusg commented Jul 19, 2019

Adding grammar rules to the Filter EBNF grammar to permit 'property CONTAINS another_property' constructs, which are described in the specification as optional features.

This PR is based, as discussed in (#161), on the most recent develop branch, but otherwise has the same relevant changes; I'll close that previous PR.

@sauliusg sauliusg requested review from CasperWA, rartino and merkys July 19, 2019 15:52
@sauliusg sauliusg added the PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing label Jul 19, 2019
rartino
rartino previously approved these changes Jul 20, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@rartino rartino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems good to me. Thanks for rebasing it.

@rartino rartino added this to the 1.0 release milestone Oct 25, 2019
@CasperWA
Copy link
Member

@sauliusg; could you give me writing access to your fork? Then I will update the part in optimade.md to the new optimade.rst. Otherwise you are welcome to do it yourself :)

@sauliusg
Copy link
Contributor Author

sauliusg commented Nov 2, 2019

@rartino @merkys @giovannipizzi @CasperWA : please review the port to RST and approve it if you find it right so that it does not get into conflict again :)

Copy link
Member

@CasperWA CasperWA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @sauliusg!

With regards to the rst formatting, all looks good for me. I would like @rartino to re-approve before merging.

@CasperWA CasperWA requested a review from rartino November 2, 2019 14:55
Copy link
Contributor

@rartino rartino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this still looks good to me.

@rartino rartino merged commit 9865fa8 into Materials-Consortia:develop Nov 3, 2019
merkys added a commit to Materials-Consortia/OPTIMADE-Filter that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
merkys added a commit to Materials-Consortia/OPTIMADE-Filter that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR/ready-for-review Add this flag if you are the author of the PR and you want it to be reviewed. Remove it when editing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants