Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix: typos (ethereum#362)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* Fix: typo

Fix: typo

* Fix: typos

Fix: typos

* Fix: typo

Fix: typo
  • Loading branch information
omahs authored Jan 27, 2023
1 parent 8ce30fc commit c9717e3
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ information.

[View the spec][graphql-schema]

[EIP-1767][eip-1767] proposed a GraphQL schema for interacting with Ethereum clients. Since then Besu and Geth have implemented the interface. This repo contains a live specification to integrate changes to the protocol as well as other improvements into the GraphQL shema.
[EIP-1767][eip-1767] proposed a GraphQL schema for interacting with Ethereum clients. Since then Besu and Geth have implemented the interface. This repo contains a live specification to integrate changes to the protocol as well as other improvements into the GraphQL schema.

### Generation

Expand Down
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions docs/making-changes.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ there can be a huge variance in actual design decisions.

As an example, a proposal for a method such as `eth_totalSupply` seems
reasonable. This is a quantity that users are often interested in and it would
nice to have it available. However, tracking the total supply is tricky. There
be nice to have it available. However, tracking the total supply is tricky. There
are several avenues where ether can enter and leave supply. This method would
need to either i) compute the value on demand or ii) store value for each block
height.
Expand All @@ -64,13 +64,13 @@ method be created.

## Standardization

There is not a formal process for standardization of API changes. However, the
outline below should given proposal authors and champions a rough process to
There is no formal process for standardization of API changes. However, the
outline below should give proposal authors and champions a rough process to
follow.

### Idea

An often overlooked aspect on the standardization journey is the idea phase.
An often overlooked aspect of the standardization journey is the idea phase.
This is an important period of time, because some focused effort at this point
in time can save time and make the rest of the process much smoother.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ clients. This should be expected and not discourage authors.
After client teams acknowledge and accept the change, it is usually on them to
implement the method in their client. Due to the lack of versioning of the API,
it is preferable that clients release the method roughly at the same time so
that there is not much time where some clients support a certain methods and
that there is not much time when some clients support certain methods and
others don't.


Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/engine/paris.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ The payload build process is specified as follows:

4. Consensus Layer client software **SHOULD** poll this endpoint every 60 seconds.

5. Execution Layer client software **SHOULD** surface an error to the user if it does not recieve a request on this endpoint at least once every 120 seconds.
5. Execution Layer client software **SHOULD** surface an error to the user if it does not receive a request on this endpoint at least once every 120 seconds.

6. Considering the absence of the `TERMINAL_BLOCK_NUMBER` setting, Consensus Layer client software **MAY** use `0` value for the `terminalBlockNumber` field in the input parameters of this call.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit c9717e3

Please sign in to comment.