Update token handling #4054
Update token handling #4054
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a consistent authentication mechanism across multiple handlers and API routes by importing and utilizing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pages/api/user/create.tsx (1)
37-42: Extend token validation by extracting and using user claims
You are currently returning a 401 ifverifyAccessToken(token)returns falsy. That ensures basic token validity. However, consider extracting user/role claims from the decoded token to enforce role-based authorization if needed. This can bolster security and clarity.handlers/risk/get.ts (1)
113-118: Consider supporting granular token claims
Here, token verification is merely a pass/fail check. If your application eventually needs role-specific access or more detailed checks, suggest introspecting token claims to centralize logic. Reducing repeated logic across files can also improve maintainability.handlers/vault/createOrUpdate.ts (1)
27-32: Leverage expanded token claims for vault operations
You return 401 if the decoded token is falsy, which is a sound basic check. If you need to confirm user or ownership claims before creating/updating a vault, consider verifying additional properties (e.g., user roles, ownership details) in the token.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
handlers/rays/dailyRays.ts(2 hunks)handlers/risk/get.ts(2 hunks)handlers/vault/createOrUpdate.ts(2 hunks)pages/api/user/create.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pages/api/user/create.tsx (1)
4-4: Ensure correct path and token validation checks
The new import path looks correct, but please double-check that thepages/api/auth/check-authpath remains valid in all environments. Also confirm thatverifyAccessTokenproperly checks the token’s signature, expiration, and any additional claims.handlers/risk/get.ts (1)
2-2: Import statement verified
This import forverifyAccessTokenis consistent with the approach in other handlers. No concerns here.handlers/vault/createOrUpdate.ts (1)
3-3: Import approach consistent
ImportingverifyAccessTokenaligns with the overall token validation approach. Looks good.handlers/rays/dailyRays.ts (2)
3-3: Import statement confirmed
TheverifyAccessTokenimport is consistent with previous files, establishing uniform token verification across handlers.
34-39: Handle possible token decoding errors
Consider wrappingverifyAccessToken(token)in a try/catch or verifying that the utility handles token expiration and malformed tokens gracefully. IfverifyAccessTokenthrows an exception for certain invalid tokens, handling that scenario ensures more robust error reporting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
pages/api/auth/check-auth.ts (1)
34-37: Consider returning a more descriptive error message for mismatched addresses.The code returns a generic 401 error without clarifying the root cause of the mismatch. Providing a concise error message in the response body (e.g., "Token address does not match requested wallet address") could improve transparency and debugging experience.
handlers/tos/get.ts (1)
25-27: Ensure consistent handling of mismatches across the application.Returning
authorized = falseis functionally correct, but the rest of the codebase typically returns a 401 HTTP status with a JSON payload for mismatches. Consider using a 401 response, as done elsewhere, to maintain consistent signaling of authentication errors.handlers/tos/sign.ts (1)
26-29: Unify chain validation if required.The code checks that the decoded address matches the request's wallet address. If your application also relies on chain IDs for different networks, you might consider validating the
decoded.chainIdmatches the relevant chain context to further strengthen security.handlers/rays/dailyRays.ts (4)
3-3: Keep import statements consistent with coding conventions.The import statement for
verifyAccessTokenis straightforward. Ensure that import order and grouping remain consistent across the codebase if there are established internal guidelines (e.g., grouping external and internal imports separately).
34-35: Validate token structure before decoding.Although
verifyAccessTokenhandles invalid tokens gracefully, an additional check to ensure the token is structurally valid (e.g., verifying presence of key fields likeaddress) could be beneficial. This helps avoid any edge cases where a malformed token might pass initial validation but omit address data.
36-38: Return a descriptive error for invalid token decoding.While returning
{ authenticated: false }is fine, providing a brief error message (e.g., "Invalid or expired token") can expedite troubleshooting when developers or users encounter authentication failures.
40-42: Avoid silent address mismatches for improved debugging.Similar to other suggestions, returning a short error reason (e.g., "Unauthorized: address mismatch") helps differentiate this 401 from other authentication-related errors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
handlers/rays/dailyRays.ts(3 hunks)handlers/risk/get.ts(2 hunks)handlers/tos/get.ts(1 hunks)handlers/tos/sign.ts(1 hunks)handlers/vault/createOrUpdate.ts(2 hunks)pages/api/auth/check-auth.ts(1 hunks)pages/api/user/create.tsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- pages/api/user/create.tsx
- handlers/risk/get.ts
- handlers/vault/createOrUpdate.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
handlers/rays/dailyRays.ts (2)
12-12: Confirm correct usage oftoLowerCase()for address storage.Storing addresses in lowercase is a common best practice for case-insensitive lookups. Ensure the rest of your application consistently lowercases addresses, avoiding subtle mismatches.
28-28: Use consistent token-retrieval logic across all endpoints.Using
`token-${address.toLowerCase()}`is consistent with other handlers. Confirm that all endpoints referencing wallet addresses follow the same pattern, ensuring uniform cookie naming and retrieval.
Update token handling
Changes 👷♀️
How to test 🧪
- step 1 ...Summary by CodeRabbit
Security Enhancements
Authentication