Merge pull request #1847 from OffchainLabs/derek/bold-on-orbit-updates

add a few more warnings to bold on Orbit

arbitrum-docs/launch-orbit-chain/bold-adoption-for-orbit-chains.mdx

@@ -60,11 +60,11 @@ Adopting Arbitrum BoLD for your Orbit chain will require upgrading the Nitro nod
 
 #### Secured by interactive fraud-proofs
 
-Arbitrum chains will continue to be secured with an interactive proving game between validators using fraud proofs. The same single-honest party assumption applies but now with strict improvements to security to the point where chains like Arbitrum One can be permissionlessly validated and have their state assertions be permissionlesly challenged.
+Arbitrum BoLD is not an upgrade to a different type of proving architecture and will continue to be secured with an interactive proving game between validators using fraud proofs. The same single-honest party assumption applies but now with strict improvements to security to the point where chains, like Arbitrum One, can be permissionlessly validated and have their state assertions be permissionlesly challenged.
 
 #### Use of your project's native token as the bonding asset to secure the chain
 
-Arbitrum BoLD enables the chain owner to use any `ERC-20` token on the parent chain as the bond for validators to participate in securing the network. By default, this token will be `WETH` for <a data-quicklook-from="arbitrum-one">Arbitrum One</a> and we recommend teams consult our documentation to understand [why `WETH` was selected for Arbitrum One](https://docs.arbitrum.io/how-arbitrum-works/bold/gentle-introduction#q-why-is-arb-not-the-bonding-token-used-in-bold-on-arbitrum-one) (and not `ARB`).
+Arbitrum BoLD enables the chain owner to use any `ERC-20` token on the parent chain as the bond for validators to participate in securing the network. By default, this token will be `WETH` for <a data-quicklook-from="arbitrum-one">Arbitrum One</a> and we do not recommend teams to use alternative tokens as the bonding asset. For more information on the rationale, we recommend teams consult our documentation to understand [why `WETH` was selected for Arbitrum One](https://docs.arbitrum.io/how-arbitrum-works/bold/gentle-introduction#q-why-is-arb-not-the-bonding-token-used-in-bold-on-arbitrum-one) (and not `ARB`).
 
 #### Increased censorship resistance for `L3` Orbit chains
 
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ If the bond sizes are set too low, an adversary can cheaply create a challenge a
 
 Due to the uniquely different tokenomics, sizes, and varying types of <a data-quicklook-from= "arbitrum-orbit">Arbitrum Orbit</a> chains deployed (or in active development) today, <a data-quicklook-from= "offchain-labs">Offchain Labs</a> does not provide a "one-size-fits-all" recommendation for how best to safely set up and enable permissionless validation for Orbit chains. Instead, we recommend teams adopt Arbitrum BoLD but keep validation permissioned.
 
-If your team would like to have permissionless validation for your Orbit chain, please reach out to us [via this form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe5YWxFbJ8DgWcDNbIW2YYuTRmegtx2FHObym00_sOt0kq4wA/viewform) so that we can schedule some time to understand your needs better.
+Should Orbit teams strongly desire to adopt Arbitrum BoLD in permissionless mode, we do not endorse using configurations that differ from those on [Arbitrum One](https://github.com/OffchainLabs/nitro-contracts/blob/bold-merge/scripts/files/configs/arb1.ts). We especially do not recommend teams use custom ERC20 tokens as the bonding asset and/or with low bond minimums. If your team would like to have permissionless validation for your Orbit chain, please reach out to us [via this form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe5YWxFbJ8DgWcDNbIW2YYuTRmegtx2FHObym00_sOt0kq4wA/viewform) so that we can schedule some time to understand your needs better.
 
 ### How to adopt Arbitrum BoLD