Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Categorize items in README #30

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Categorize items in README #30

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

strivn
Copy link
Contributor

@strivn strivn commented Dec 13, 2024

Resource Addition

Category

N/A

Description

Simple categorization that I could think of for now. Design considerations:

  • I was thinking to make it less 'cluttered' on first glance, so I used expanding sections. But at the same time, I want to ensure people don't have to put additional effort to look at resources. So for FL (which is the main focus, presumably, and where we have most resources) I made it open by default.
  • I'm thinking of separating another section of "beginner friendly" resources too, but this may need further curation. I think it'd be really helpful for people who are just starting out (e.g. Google Comic, Zama's Intro, etc).

Checklist

  • I have followed the contribution guidelines
  • The resource is freely accessible (or marked if paid)
  • I have added it to the appropriate category
  • The link is functional
  • The description is clear and concise

@strivn
Copy link
Contributor Author

strivn commented Dec 13, 2024

For how it may look like on github: https://github.com/strivn/30DaysOfFLCode-1/tree/main

@leriomaggio
Copy link
Collaborator

Love this and thanks very much for putting this together.

I would just work a little better on categories (E.g. FL section also contains resources about DP).

Can you please iterate on that again?
Also, I would keep tools out of the equations and maybe having them listed on top as first thing. Especially for tools like SyftBox who are supporting multiple PETs by design :)

@strivn
Copy link
Contributor Author

strivn commented Dec 18, 2024

New related PR: #36

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants