Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ansible] Full uv support #235

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

[ansible] Full uv support #235

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

goldyfruit
Copy link
Member

@goldyfruit goldyfruit commented Jan 2, 2025

Full uv support since these two PRs got merged.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated package installation method from ansible.builtin.pip to moreati.uv.pip in virtual environment setup tasks
    • Improved package management for Python virtual environments across multiple roles
    • Refined virtual environment configuration and package installation processes

@goldyfruit goldyfruit added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 2, 2025
@goldyfruit goldyfruit added this to the Wolfenstein milestone Jan 2, 2025
@goldyfruit goldyfruit self-assigned this Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications to Ansible playbooks for Open Voice OS, specifically replacing the ansible.builtin.pip module with moreati.uv.pip for Python package installation. The changes affect two key Ansible roles: ovos_hardware_mark2 and ovos_installer, focusing on virtual environment management and package installation processes. The modifications aim to improve package management while maintaining the existing logic and conditions for task execution.

Changes

File Change Summary
ansible/roles/ovos_hardware_mark2/tasks/vocalfusion.yml Replaced ansible.builtin.pip with moreati.uv.pip for Python package installation in VocalFusion hardware setup
ansible/roles/ovos_installer/tasks/virtualenv/venv.yml Updated multiple tasks to use moreati.uv.pip for virtual environment package management, including installations for tflite_runtime, ggwave, and Open Voice OS requirements

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement

Poem

🐰 Pip, pip, hooray! A module's new way,
Uv swoops in with package delight,
Ansible tasks now dance with might,
Virtual environments shine so bright,
Open Voice OS takes its flight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ansible/roles/ovos_installer/tasks/virtualenv/venv.yml (1)

Line range hint 47-106: Consider adding uv-specific performance improvements

While the module replacement is correct, we could leverage uv-specific features for better performance.

Consider the following optimizations:

  1. Use uv's parallel installation capability
  2. Leverage uv's built-in caching
  3. Consider using uv's lockfile feature for reproducible installations

Example configuration:

  moreati.uv.pip:
    requirements: "{{ item.file }}"
    virtualenv: "{{ ovos_installer_user_home }}/.venvs/ovos"
-   extra_args: "{{ _pip_args }}"
+   extra_args: "{{ _pip_args }} --cache-dir={{ ovos_installer_user_home }}/.cache/uv --parallel"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88327ac and 4577937.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ansible/roles/ovos_hardware_mark2/tasks/vocalfusion.yml (1 hunks)
  • ansible/roles/ovos_installer/tasks/virtualenv/venv.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
ansible/roles/ovos_hardware_mark2/tasks/vocalfusion.yml (1)

Line range hint 65-70: Verify uv module compatibility with hardware-specific packages

The change from ansible.builtin.pip to moreati.uv.pip looks good. However, since these packages are critical for hardware functionality, we should verify compatibility.

Let's verify if these packages are compatible with uv installation:

✅ Verification successful

Hardware packages are compatible with uv installation

The verification shows that:

  1. All required packages (Adafruit-Blinka 8.50.0, smbus2 0.5.0, RPi.GPIO 0.7.1, gpiod 2.2.3) are available on PyPI and actively maintained
  2. These packages are only used in the Mark 2 hardware setup (vocalfusion.yml)
  3. The uv module is already being used successfully in other parts of the system (ovos_installer/tasks/virtualenv/venv.yml)
  4. The virtualenv setup remains intact with proper Python environment configuration

The change from ansible.builtin.pip to moreati.uv.pip is safe as the packages are standard Python packages with no special installation requirements.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the required packages are available and compatible with uv
# Note: This helps ensure the packages can be installed via uv without issues

# Check package availability on PyPI
for pkg in "Adafruit-Blinka" "smbus2" "RPi.GPIO" "gpiod"; do
  echo "Checking $pkg..."
  curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/$pkg/json" | jq -r '.info.version'
done

# Check for any known installation issues with these packages
rg -A 3 "Adafruit-Blinka|smbus2|RPi.GPIO|gpiod" README.md docs/

Length of output: 808


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any specific version constraints or configurations for these packages in the codebase
rg -A 3 "Adafruit-Blinka|smbus2|RPi.GPIO|gpiod" ansible/

# Check if there are any other roles or tasks that depend on these packages
fd -e yml -e yaml . ansible/ --exec grep -l "Adafruit-Blinka\|smbus2\|RPi.GPIO\|gpiod" {}

# Check if there are any specific uv configurations or requirements
fd -e yml -e yaml . ansible/ --exec grep -l "moreati.uv.pip" {}

Length of output: 976

ansible/roles/ovos_installer/tasks/virtualenv/venv.yml (4)

55-58: LGTM: Basic venv creation with wheel

The fallback case for non-capable CPUs is correctly implemented.


Line range hint 62-66: Verify ggwave architecture-specific installation

The module change looks good. The architecture-specific condition is preserved.

Let's verify ggwave availability:

✅ Verification successful

ggwave package availability verified for both architectures

The verification confirms that:

  • ggwave v0.4.2 wheels are available on the trusted host (whl.smartgic.io) for both aarch64 and x86_64 architectures
  • The same version (0.4.2) is available on PyPI as a fallback
  • Wheels are available for Python versions 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13

The architecture-specific installation is properly configured and the package is accessible from both sources.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check ggwave package availability for supported architectures

# Check if ggwave is available on the trusted host
curl -s https://whl.smartgic.io | rg "ggwave.*aarch64|ggwave.*x86_64"

# Check if ggwave is available on PyPI as fallback
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ggwave/json | jq -r '.info.version'

Length of output: 977


47-51: Verify tflite_runtime installation via trusted host

The module change looks good, but we should ensure the trusted host setup works with uv.

Let's verify the trusted host configuration:

✅ Verification successful

Trusted host and tflite_runtime package configuration is valid

The verification confirms:

  • The trusted host whl.smartgic.io is accessible (HTTP 200 response)
  • Multiple tflite_runtime wheel packages (version 2.17.0) are available for different Python versions and architectures
  • The extra_args configuration with --trusted-host and -f flags is correctly set for the uv module
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify trusted host accessibility and tflite_runtime availability

# Check if the trusted host is accessible
curl -I https://whl.smartgic.io

# Check if tflite_runtime is available on the trusted host
curl -s https://whl.smartgic.io | rg "tflite_runtime"

Length of output: 1733


Line range hint 67-106: Verify retry mechanism compatibility with uv

The implementation looks good with proper retry logic preserved. The conditional installation based on profiles and features is maintained.

Let's verify the requirements file handling:

✅ Verification successful

UV compatibility with requirements files confirmed

Based on the requirements files content inspection, the requirements syntax is compatible with UV:

  • Standard PyPI package specifications (e.g., ovos-gui, ovos-messagebus)
  • Package extras syntax (e.g., ovos-audio[extras], ovos-core[lgpl,plugins])
  • Git repository installations (e.g., git+https://github.com/...)

The retry mechanism in the task is also compatible as it uses standard Ansible retry functionality that works independently of the package manager used.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check requirements files structure and compatibility

# Check for any potential syntax issues in requirements templates
fd -e j2 . ansible/roles/ovos_installer/templates/virtualenv/ -x cat {} \; | \
  rg -e "^[^#].*" -e "^#.*\[.*\].*$" -A 1

# Look for any uv-specific syntax in requirements
fd -e txt -e j2 . ansible/roles/ovos_installer/templates/virtualenv/ -x rg "^[^#].*(@|==|>=|<=|~=|!=)" {} \;

Length of output: 10490


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual requirements files content
fd -e txt . ansible/roles/ovos_installer/templates/virtualenv/ -x cat {} \;

# Also check if there are any specific uv configurations or settings
fd . ansible/roles/ovos_installer/defaults/ -x cat {} \; | rg -i "uv|pip"

Length of output: 159


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for requirements files in a broader scope
fd requirements.txt ansible/roles/ovos_installer/ -x cat {} \;

# Check for any uv or pip related configurations in main.yml
find ansible/roles/ovos_installer/ -name main.yml -exec cat {} \; | rg -i "uv|pip"

# Look for template files that might generate requirements
fd . ansible/roles/ovos_installer/templates/ -x ls -la {} \;

Length of output: 7151

@goldyfruit goldyfruit merged commit 2415c4e into main Jan 2, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
@goldyfruit goldyfruit deleted the feat/full_uv branch January 2, 2025 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant