fix: task routes and models #26
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@kshitij-k-osmosys has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe DotnetFoundation project has updated its Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Api/Controllers/TaskController.cs (7 hunks)
- DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Application/Models/DTOs/TaskDetailsDTO/TaskDetailsRequest.cs (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Application/Models/DTOs/TaskDetailsDTO/TaskDetailsRequest.cs (2)
- 11-11: The addition of the
[StringLength(100, ErrorMessage = "Description Max Length is 100")]attribute to theDescriptionproperty correctly enforces a maximum length of 100 characters. This change aligns with the PR objectives to enhance data validation within the task models. It's a good practice to provide clear error messages, as done here, to improve the user experience when validation fails.- 27-27: The addition of the
[StringLength(100, ErrorMessage = "Category Max Length is 100")]attribute to theCategoryproperty is consistent with the validation added to theDescriptionproperty. This ensures that theCategoryfield also adheres to the maximum length constraint of 100 characters, contributing to maintaining data integrity and consistency. The explicit error message provided will aid developers and users in understanding validation errors more clearly.DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Api/Controllers/TaskController.cs (5)
- 10-10: Updating the base route of the
TaskControllerto/apiis a significant change that aligns with the PR objectives to refine the API's routing mechanism for task-related operations. This change simplifies the API structure and makes it more intuitive for developers working with the application. Ensure that this base route change is reflected in any documentation or client-side code that interacts with these endpoints.- 22-22: The endpoint for getting all tasks has been correctly updated to
tasksunder the new base route/api. This change makes the endpoint's purpose clear and is consistent with RESTful API design principles. The use of HTTP status codes for different response types is also a good practice, enhancing the API's usability and error handling.- 38-38: The addition of the
tasks/activeendpoint under the base route/apifor fetching all active tasks is a logical extension of the API's functionality. This endpoint provides a focused access point for retrieving tasks that are currently active, which can be particularly useful for users or systems interested in the current workload or task status. The response status codes used are appropriate for the possible outcomes of this operation.- 55-55: The
tasks/{taskId}endpoint for fetching task details by ID has been correctly defined, adhering to RESTful principles by using a path variable for the task ID. This allows for a clean and intuitive way to access specific task information. The inclusion of various HTTP status codes for different scenarios (success, bad request, not found, internal server error) is commendable, as it provides clear feedback on the operation's outcome.- 93-93: The
tasks/{taskId}endpoint for updating task details is well-defined, using the HTTP PUT method which is appropriate for update operations. The use of a path variable for specifying the task ID and accepting modified task details in the request body follows RESTful API design best practices. This endpoint's clear definition facilitates easy and intuitive updates to task records.
| @@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ public async Task<ActionResult<BaseResponse<TaskDetailsResponse>>> GetTaskByIdAs | |||
| /// Add new task. | |||
| /// </summary> | |||
| /// <param name="detailRequest">Role request details</param> | |||
| [HttpPost] | |||
| [HttpPost("task")] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The task endpoint for adding a new task is correctly implemented as a POST operation, which aligns with RESTful design principles for creating resources. However, it's worth noting that the singular form task is used here, whereas other endpoints use the plural form tasks. While this is not incorrect, it's generally a good practice to maintain consistency in naming conventions across the API. Consider aligning this endpoint with others by using the plural form tasks for consistency.
- [HttpPost("task")]
+ [HttpPost("tasks")]Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| [HttpPost("task")] | |
| [HttpPost("tasks")] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Api/Controllers/TaskController.cs (2 hunks)
- DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Services/Services/TaskDetailsService/TaskDetailsService.cs (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Api/Controllers/TaskController.cs
Additional comments: 5
DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Services/Services/TaskDetailsService/TaskDetailsService.cs (5)
- 39-40: The introduction of
NotFoundExceptioninGetTaskByIdAsyncmethod for handling cases where a task does not exist is a good practice. It improves the specificity and clarity of error handling over using generic exceptions.- 47-47: Using
NotFoundExceptioninInsertTaskAsyncmethod when the assigned user does not exist enhances the error handling by providing a clear and specific exception. This is a positive change for maintaining data integrity and providing meaningful feedback to the caller.- 73-73: The use of
NotFoundExceptioninUpdateTaskAsyncmethod for handling non-existent tasks is consistent with best practices for error handling, providing clear and specific feedback.- 76-76: Applying
NotFoundExceptioninUpdateTaskAsyncmethod when the assigned user does not exist is a good practice. It ensures that errors are specific and informative, aiding in debugging and user feedback.- 89-89: Throwing
NotFoundExceptioninInactiveTaskAsyncmethod when a task does not exist is an appropriate use of custom exceptions for specific error scenarios. This enhances the clarity and manageability of error handling.
| int? taskId = await _taskDetailsRepository.InsertTaskAsync(taskDetails).ConfigureAwait(false) | ||
|
|
||
| int? taskId = await _taskDetailsRepository.InsertTaskAsync(taskDetails).ConfigureAwait(false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of a generic Exception in InsertTaskAsync method when there is an error inserting task details is not ideal. It's recommended to define or use a more specific exception type for database operation failures to improve error handling and debugging.
Consider introducing a custom exception, such as DatabaseOperationException, to replace the generic Exception for more specific error handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Application/Models/DTOs/TaskDetailsDTO/TaskDetailsRequest.cs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- DotnetFoundation/DotnetFoundation.Application/Models/DTOs/TaskDetailsDTO/TaskDetailsRequest.cs
Closing this as Pagination task has these changes
Description
fix: task routes and models
Summary by CodeRabbit