-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ruleset::expandRulesetReference(): add tests #801
Ruleset::expandRulesetReference(): add tests #801
Conversation
Based on the code coverage report, nearly all those lines are covered via some pre-existing tests, most likely in the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. I have raised a couple of points inline, but these should not be blockers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good to me; thanks for updating.
Thanks for reviewing @fredden ! I'll squash that last commit into the commit it belongs to and will merge once the build has passed again. |
Co-authored-by: Dan Wallis <[email protected]>
Note: test coverage for the `Ruleset::expandRulesetReference()` method will still not be 100% even after the addition of these tests. * There are some conditions which are specific to running PHPCS via a PHAR file. At this time, the tests are not run with a PHAR file, which means these lines cannot be covered via the tests. * As for the other uncovered lines/branches: my fantasy ran out and I couldn't come up with a situation which would trigger that code. Code archaeology (`git blame`) to find out why the code was introduced unfortunately didn't help. This may indicate the code is redundant and can be removed, but this is not certain at this time and leaving the code in place is not harming anyone for now. If over time, nobody can come up with a real life situation which would allow us to test those lines, it could be considered to remove them in a future major release to see what breaks....
dfdcab2
to
ef411ee
Compare
Description
Ruleset::expandRulesetReference(): test handling "homepath" references
Ruleset::expandRulesetReference(): test handling "Internal" references
Ruleset::expandRulesetReference(): add miscellaneous tests
Note: test coverage for the
Ruleset::expandRulesetReference()
method will still not be 100% even after the addition of these tests.Code archaeology (
git blame
) to find out why the code was introduced unfortunately didn't help.This may indicate the code is redundant and can be removed, but this is not certain at this time and leaving the code in place is not harming anyone for now.
If over time, nobody can come up with a real life situation which would allow us to test those lines, it could be considered to remove them in a future major release to see what breaks....
Suggested changelog entry
N/A
Related issues/external references
This PR is part of a series of PRs expanding the tests for the
Ruleset
class.