[BUG] Microsoft Outlook - new-email

[michelle0927]

Resolves the bug observed in this comment.

025-01-15T11:39:05
error
TypeError: Cannot destructure property 'id' of 'folders.find(...)' as it is undefined.
at Object.getFolderIdByName (file:///var/task/user/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs:66:15)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
at async Object.deploy (file:///var/task/user/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs:34:39)
at async /var/task/index.js:95:13
at async captureObservations (/var/task/node_modules/@lambda-v2/component-runtime/src/captureObservations.js:28:5)
at async exports.main [as handler] (/var/task/index.js:60:20)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Updated Microsoft Outlook component package version from 1.0.4 to 1.0.5
  • Updated Microsoft Outlook new-email source version from 0.0.10 to 0.0.11

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved error handling in folder ID retrieval method to prevent potential errors when no matching folder is found

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
docs-v2	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Jan 15, 2025 9:51pm
pipedream-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Jan 15, 2025 9:51pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Jan 15, 2025 9:51pm

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request involves version updates for the Microsoft Outlook component, specifically in the package.json and new-email.mjs files. The primary change is an improvement to the getFolderIdByName method in the new-email.mjs file, which now provides more robust error handling by safely accessing folder IDs. Both files have had their version numbers incrementally updated.

Changes

File	Change Summary
components/microsoft_outlook/package.json	Version bumped from 1.0.4 to 1.0.5
components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs	- Version updated from 0.0.10 to 0.0.11 - Improved getFolderIdByName method with safer folder ID retrieval

Possibly related PRs

• Update new-email.mjs #15001: Updates to the new-email.mjs file in the Microsoft Outlook component, similar to the current PR's changes

Suggested labels

bug, User submitted

Suggested reviewers

• GTFalcao

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
Where Outlook's emails take their flight,
With version bumps and error care,
Our code now dances without a snare,
Hopping forward with gentle might! 🚀

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs (1)

66-67: Consider adding explicit error handling.

While the current changes fix the TypeError, consider adding explicit error handling for API failures and logging when a folder is not found:

 async getFolderIdByName(name) {
-  const { value: folders } = await this.listFolders();
-  const folder = folders.find(({ displayName }) => displayName === name);
-  return folder?.id;
+  try {
+    const { value: folders } = await this.listFolders();
+    const folder = folders.find(({ displayName }) => displayName === name);
+    if (!folder) {
+      console.log(`Folder not found: ${name}`);
+    }
+    return folder?.id;
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error(`Error fetching folder ${name}:`, error);
+    throw error;
+  }

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34f5a2a and f6d6f24.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• components/microsoft_outlook/package.json (1 hunks)
• components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs (2 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• components/microsoft_outlook/package.json

🔇 Additional comments (2)

components/microsoft_outlook/sources/new-email/new-email.mjs (2)

10-10: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.

The patch version increment aligns with the bug fix changes.

---

66-67: LGTM! Bug fix properly handles undefined folder case.

The implementation safely handles the case when a folder is not found by:

1. Storing the find result in an intermediate variable
2. Using optional chaining to safely access the id property

This effectively resolves the TypeError that occurred when attempting to destructure 'id' from undefined.

[jcortes]

Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Readyf for QA!

[vunguyenhung]

Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release!

Test report
https://vunguyenhung.notion.site/BUG-Microsoft-Outlook-new-email-17cbf548bb5e8190b7feef323197fbb0