Simple in-memory cache conception built on Map
.
Add dependencies:
repositories {
mavenCentral()
}
dependencies {
implementation("com.redmadrobot.mapmemory:mapmemory:2.1")
// or if you want to work with MapMemory in reactive style, add one of
implementation("com.redmadrobot.mapmemory:mapmemory-coroutines:2.1")
implementation("com.redmadrobot.mapmemory:mapmemory-rxjava2:2.1")
implementation("com.redmadrobot.mapmemory:mapmemory-rxjava3:2.1")
// if you want to test code that uses MapMemory
testImplementation("com.redmadrobot.mapmemory:mapmemory-test:2.1")
}
Kotlin provides delegates to access values in a map:
val map = mapOf("answer" to 42)
val answer: Int by map
println(answer) // 42
This library uses this idea to implement in-memory storage.
There are two simple principles:
- MapMemory is a singleton, and it is shared between many consumers
- MapMemory holds data but doesn't know what data it holds
Tip
If you use any kind of DI framework, you should provide MapMemory
with the desired scope.
For example, if you want your data to live forever, use singleton scope:
@Provides
@Singleton
fun provideMapMemory(): MapMemory = MapMemory()
If you don't use any DI framework, you should take care of the MapMemory
lifetime.
Imagine, you have UsersRepository
used to get users' information from API.
You want to remember the last requested user.
Let's store it in a MapMemory
:
class UsersRepository(
private val api: Api,
memory: MapMemory, // (1) Inject MapMemory into the constructor
) {
var lastUser: User? by memory // (2) Declare in-memory property using delegate
private set
suspend fun getUser(email: String): User {
return api.getUser(email)
.also { lastUser = it } // (3) Use the property
}
}
MapMemory
is a singleton, but UsersRepository
is not.
Property lastUser
is tied to MapMemory
lifetime, so it will survive UsersRepository
recreation.
You can specify the default value that will be used when the value you're trying to read is not set.
For example, we don't want a nullable User
, but want to get placeholder object User.EMPTY
instead:
var lastUser: User by memory { User.EMPTY }
You can write the following code to store a mutable list in MapMemory
:
val users: MutableList<User> by memory { mutableListOf() }
Boilerplate. Fortunately, there are shorthand accessors to store lists and maps:
val users by memory.mutableList<User>()
Accessors mutableList
and mutableMap
use concurrent collections under the hood.
Accessor | Default value | Description |
---|---|---|
map() |
Empty map | Store map |
mutableMap() |
Empty mutable map | Store values in map |
list() |
Empty list | Store list |
mutableList() |
Empty mutable list | Store values in list |
Feel free to create your accessors if needed.
If you don't want some value to be removed from memory on [MapMemory.clear] and want to clear the value instead, you can create a reusable property.
Such properties use the given clear
lambda to clear the current value.
class Counter {
fun reset() { /*...*/
}
}
val counter: Counter by memory(clear = { it.reset() }) { Counter() }
Reusable properties are especially useful for reactive types like Flow
because you don't need to re-subscribe to Flow
after MapMemory
is cleared.
Note
Many of the default accessors already return reusable properties. See the accessor's description to check if it returns reusable property.
Let's look at how MapMemory works under the hood. We have a class with an in-memory property declared using delegate:
package com.example
class TokenStorage(memory: MapMemory) {
var authToken: String by memory
}
MapMemory
is MutableMap<String, Any>
.
Delegate accesses map value by a key retrieved from the property name.
This behavior differs for two types of in-memory property delegates:
- Scoped to the class where the property is declared.
Property key is a combination of class and property name:
com.example.TokenStorage#authToken
- Shared between all classes by the specified key.
All properties are scoped by default, you can share it with the function
shared
.
Property authToken
is scoped to class TokenStorage
, but we can share it:
// It is a good practice to declare constants for shared keys.
const val KEY_AUTH_TOKEN = "authToken"
class TokenStorage(memory: MapMemory) {
var authToken: String by memory.shared(KEY_AUTH_TOKEN)
}
class Authenticator(memory: MapMemory) {
// Property name may be different
var savedToken: String by memory.shared(KEY_AUTH_TOKEN)
}
Both TokenStorage
and Authenticator
will use the same value.
Warning
Keep in mind that this is just an example.
In real code, it may be more reasonable to inject TokenStorage
into Authenticator
instead of sharing in-memory property by key.
Reactive subscription to values is useful to keep data shared between several screens up to date.
To use MapMemory in reactive style, replace dependency mapmemory
with one of the following:
mapmemory-coroutines
mapmemory-rxjava2
mapmemory-rxjava3
These modules provide accessors for reactive types:
// with coroutines
val selectedOption: MutableStateFlow<Option> by memory.stateFlow(Option.DEFAULT)
// with RxJava
val selectedOption: BehaviorSubject<Option> by memory.behaviorSubject()
Warning
You can use only one of these dependencies at the same time Otherwise build will fail due to duplicates in the classpath.
MapMemory provides the type ReactiveMutableMap
.
It works similarly to MutableMap
but enables you to observe data reactively.
There are methods to observe one or all map values.
You can implement a cache-first approach using ReactiveMutableMap
:
Coroutines
class UsersRepository(
api: Api,
memory: MapMemory,
) {
private val usersCache by memory.reactiveMutableMap<String, User>()
/** Returns stream of users from cache. */
fun getUsersFlow(): Flow<List<User>> = usersCache.valuesFlow
/** Returns stream of one user from cache. */
fun getUserFlow(id: String): Flow<User> = usersCache.getValueFlow(id)
/** Update users in cache. */
suspend fun fetchUsers() {
val users: List<User> = api.getUsers()
usersCache.replaceAll(users.associateBy { it.id })
}
}
JxJava
class UsersRepository(
api: Api,
memory: MapMemory,
) {
private val usersCache by memory.reactiveMutableMap<String, User>()
/** Returns stream of users from cache. */
fun getUsersObservable(): Observable<List<User>> = usersCache.valuesObservable
/** Returns stream of one user from cache. */
fun getUserObservable(id: String): Observable<User> = usersCache.getValueObservable(id)
/** Update users in cache. */
fun fetchUsers() {
val users: List<User> = api.getUsers()
usersCache.replaceAll(users.associateBy { it.id })
}
}
mapmemory-coroutines
add accessors for coroutines types:
Accessor | Default value | Description |
---|---|---|
stateFlow() |
StateFlow with specified initialValue |
Store stream of values |
sharedFlow() |
Empty flow | Store stream of values |
reactiveMutableMap() |
Empty map | Store values in reactive map |
Note
Coroutines implementation of reactive map uses SharedFlow
under the hood, so it will be triggered even if its content has not been changed.
mapmemory-rxjava2
and mapmemory-rxjava3
adds accessors for RxJava types:
Accessor | Default value | Description |
---|---|---|
behaviorSubject() |
Empty subject | Store stream of values |
publishSubject() |
Empty subject | Store stream of values |
maybe() |
Maybe.empty() |
Reactive analog to store "nullable" |
reactiveMutableMap() |
Empty map | Store values in reactive map |
It may be useful to create MapMemory
instances with a different lifetime.
You can use it to control the lifetime of the data stored within.
/** MapMemory, available during a session and cleared on logout. */
@Singleton
class SessionMemory @Inject constructor() : MapMemory()
/** MapMemory, available during the app lifetime. */
@Singleton
class AppMemory @Inject constructor() : MapMemory()
Keep in mind that you should manually clear SessionMemory
on logout.
Tip
Instead of creating subclasses, you can provide MapMemory with qualifiers.
KAPT: 'IllegalStateException: Couldn't find declaration file' on delegate with inline getValue operator
Note
This bug was fixed in Kotlin 1.8.20. Consider updating to the newest Kotlin.
There is the bug in Kotlin Compiler that affects MapMemory if you create subclasses - KT-46317.
You can use the module mapmemory-kapt-bug-workaround
as a workaround:
dependencies {
implementation("com.redmadrobot.mapmemory:mapmemory-kapt-bug-workaround:[latest-version]")
}
- val someValue: String by memory
+ val someValue: String by memory.value()
Module mapmemory-test
provides utilities helping to test code that uses MapMemory.
Imagine you want to build memory filled with mock data for the following class:
package com.example
class UserCache(memory: MapMemory) {
var name: String by memory
var ages: Int by memory
}
You can put it by key:
val memory = MapMemory()
memory["com.example.UserCache#name"] = "John Doe"
memory["com.example.UserCache#ages"] = 42
It is easy to make a mistake and this approach requires knowing how MapMemory works under the hood.
Using mapMemoryOf
and scopedKeyOf
you can build mock MapMemory
much easier:
val memory = mapMemoryOf(
scopedKeyOf(UserCache::name) to "John Doe",
scopedKeyOf(UserCache::ages) to 42,
)
You can also get or set scoped values using type-safe functions putScoped
and getScoped
:
memory.putScoped(UserCache::name, "Jane Doe")
memory.getScoped(UserCache::name)
There is an alternate syntax to use if properties in class are private and can't be accessed via reference:
scopedKeyOf<UserStorage>("name")
memory.putScoped<UserStorage>("name", "Jane Doe")
memory.getScoped<UserStorage>("name")
Note
To make an upgrade to the latest version easier, you should:
- Upgrade to v2.0
- Resolve all deprecations
- Upgrade to the latest version
Collections accessors
Now accessors map
and list
return delegates to access immutable collections.
Use mutableMap
and mutableList
for mutable versions of collections.
Closed access to getOrPutProperty
Extension getOrPutProperty
became internal (it was already in the internal
package), use the operator MapMemory.invoke
instead.
-var counter: Int by memory.getOrPutProperty { 0 }
+var counter: Int by memory { 0 }
Scoped and Shared values
Read "Scoped and Shared values" section. If you are sharing properties between classes by name, you should specify the sharing key explicitly.
Accessor .nullable()
is deprecated
Accessor nullable()
is not needed now.
You can simply declare a nullable field:
-val selectedOption: String? by memory.nullable()
+val selectedOption: String? by memory
.withDefault { ... }
is banned from use
withDefault
is no longer compatible with MapMemory, so you should use the operator invoke
instead:
-var counter: Int by memory.withDefault { 0 }
+var counter: Int by memory { 0 }
-var users by memory.reactiveMap<User>()
+var users by memory.reactiveMutableMap<String, User>()
Naming changes
The word stream
in method names was replaced with implementation-specific words to clarify the API.
Coroutines:
getStream
->getFlow
andgetValueFlow
getAllStream
->valuesFlow
RxJava:
getStream
->getValueObservable
getAllStream
->valuesObservable
Merge requests are welcome. For major changes, please open an issue first to discuss what you would like to change.