-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci(go-build): Add Docker authentication and push to DockerHub #1
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new input parameter, Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context usedactionlint
🔇 Additional comments not posted (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/go-build.yaml (2)
35-38
: LGTM: Docker Hub secrets added.The addition of
DOCKERHUB_USERNAME
andDOCKERHUB_TOKEN
secrets is appropriate for Docker Hub authentication. Marking them as required ensures they are always provided when needed.Consider using a consistent naming convention for secrets across different providers. For example, you could use
DOCKER_USERNAME
andDOCKER_TOKEN
to make it more generic if you plan to support other Docker registries in the future.
94-99
: LGTM: Environment variables added for multi-provider support.The addition of environment variables for GCP and Docker Hub is well-implemented and necessary for the multi-provider support. The use of secrets for Docker Hub credentials is a good security practice.
For consistency, consider prefixing all provider-specific environment variables. For example:
env: GCP_PROJECT_ID: ${{ env.GCP_PROJECT_ID }} GCP_WORKLOAD_IDENTITY_PROVIDER: ${{ env.GCP_WORKLOAD_IDENTITY_PROVIDER }} GCP_SERVICE_ACCOUNT: ${{ env.GCP_SERVICE_ACCOUNT }} DOCKERHUB_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }} DOCKERHUB_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_TOKEN }}This makes it easier to identify which variables belong to which provider.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/go-build.yaml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/go-build.yaml
100-100: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:8:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/go-build.yaml (2)
30-33
: LGTM: New input parameter for providers.The addition of the
PROVIDERS
input parameter is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. It provides flexibility in specifying which cloud providers to use for Docker authentication and pushing.
Line range hint
30-109
: Overall: Well-implemented multi-provider support for Docker operations.The changes in this PR successfully implement multi-provider support for Docker authentication and pushing, aligning well with the stated objectives. The addition of the
PROVIDERS
input parameter and the necessary secrets for Docker Hub authentication provides flexibility and security.The updated workflow logic correctly handles multiple providers, including provider-specific steps (e.g., for GCP). The use of environment variables and secrets is appropriate and follows good security practices.
A few minor suggestions have been made to improve consistency and prevent potential issues:
- Consider using a more generic naming convention for Docker-related secrets.
- Prefix all provider-specific environment variables for better clarity.
- Fix potential word splitting issue in the
$MAKE
command.These changes significantly enhance the workflow's capabilities and flexibility. Great job on implementing this feature!
🧰 Tools
actionlint
100-100: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:8:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/go-build.yaml
Outdated
IFS=',' read -r -a providers <<< "${{ inputs.PROVIDERS }}" | ||
for provider in "${providers[@]}"; do | ||
if [ "$provider" == "gcp" ]; then | ||
$MAKE gcp-auth | ||
$MAKE gcp-sdk-install | ||
fi | ||
echo "Running make with target: docker-login-$provider" | ||
$MAKE docker-login-$provider docker-push docker-manifest DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES='${{ inputs.DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES }}' DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH="${{ inputs.DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH }}" | ||
done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM: Multi-provider support implemented correctly.
The implementation of multi-provider support is well-done. The logic correctly splits the PROVIDERS
input, iterates over each provider, and executes the appropriate commands for each.
There's a potential issue with word splitting in the $MAKE
command on line 108. To fix this, wrap the variables in double quotes:
- $MAKE docker-login-$provider docker-push docker-manifest DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES='${{ inputs.DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES }}' DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH="${{ inputs.DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH }}"
+ $MAKE docker-login-"$provider" docker-push docker-manifest DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES='${{ inputs.DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES }}' DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH="${{ inputs.DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH }}"
This ensures that the $provider
variable is properly expanded and passed as a single argument to the $MAKE
command.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
IFS=',' read -r -a providers <<< "${{ inputs.PROVIDERS }}" | |
for provider in "${providers[@]}"; do | |
if [ "$provider" == "gcp" ]; then | |
$MAKE gcp-auth | |
$MAKE gcp-sdk-install | |
fi | |
echo "Running make with target: docker-login-$provider" | |
$MAKE docker-login-$provider docker-push docker-manifest DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES='${{ inputs.DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES }}' DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH="${{ inputs.DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH }}" | |
done | |
IFS=',' read -r -a providers <<< "${{ inputs.PROVIDERS }}" | |
for provider in "${providers[@]}"; do | |
if [ "$provider" == "gcp" ]; then | |
$MAKE gcp-auth | |
$MAKE gcp-sdk-install | |
fi | |
echo "Running make with target: docker-login-$provider" | |
$MAKE docker-login-"$provider" docker-push docker-manifest DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES='${{ inputs.DOCKER_BASE_IMAGES }}' DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH="${{ inputs.DOCKER_DOCKERFILE_PATH }}" | |
done |
Features
Summary by CodeRabbit
PROVIDERS
, allowing users to specify multiple cloud providers for Docker image builds.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME
andDOCKERHUB_TOKEN
for improved security during builds.