integrate new benchmarks for static HTTP server: binserve+wrk

[daroczig]

Overview

Required checks before merge

• Branch is based on and up-to-date with main
• PR has a clear title and/or brief description
• PR builders passed
• No red flags from coderabbit.ai
• New features, bugfixes etc are tracked in CHANGELOG.md
• Package version bumped in pyproject.toml
• add_vendor.md is up-to-date
• Alembic migrations are provided (or not needed)
  • Tested on SQLite
  • Tested on PostgreSQL
• sc-crawler pull was tested on all vendors and records
• Human approval

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced enhanced benchmarking capabilities for static HTTP servers, allowing users to evaluate performance through new metrics and configurations.
  • Added a new benchmark entry for static web servers to provide detailed performance evaluations based on varying file sizes and configurations.

• Documentation

  • Updated the changelog to reflect new benchmarking enhancements and capabilities.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new benchmark for a static HTTP server and enhance the functionality of the inspect_server_benchmarks function to process server benchmarks. Additionally, a new Benchmark entry is added to the _geekbenchmark function to detail the performance measurement parameters for a static web server.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md	Added a benchmark for a static HTTP server in the documentation.
src/sc_crawler/inspector.py	Enhanced inspect_server_benchmarks to process benchmarks for "static_web" from a JSON file.
src/sc_crawler/lookup.py	Introduced a new Benchmark entry in _geekbenchmark for measuring static web server performance.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Integrate binserve benchmarks (DEV-331)	✅

🐰 In fields of code so bright and fair,
New benchmarks sprout, with utmost care.
For static webs, we measure speed,
With threads and connections, we succeed!
So hop along, and don't delay,
Performance shines in a joyful way! ✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b4e0a6 and 014357c.

Files selected for processing (3)

• CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
• src/sc_crawler/inspector.py (1 hunks)
• src/sc_crawler/lookup.py (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• CHANGELOG.md

Additional comments not posted (2)

src/sc_crawler/lookup.py (1)

279-291: LGTM! New benchmark entry is well-defined.

The new Benchmark entry for the static web server is consistent with existing entries and correctly defined.

src/sc_crawler/inspector.py (1)

294-321: LGTM! New section for "static_web" is well-integrated.

The new section in inspect_server_benchmarks for processing "static_web" benchmarks is correctly implemented and follows existing patterns.