open send push registration request #118
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the push registration process in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant M as UBPushRegistrationManager
participant T as UBURLDataTask
C->>M: sendPushRegistrationRequest(completion)
M->>T: Create registration request task
T-->>M: Return result (token or error)
alt Success
M->>C: completion(Result.success(token))
else Failure
M->>C: completion(Result.failure(error))
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Sources/UBPush/UBPushRegistrationManager.swift (2)
87-93: Align switch cases with closing braces.
SwiftLint warns about the current switch-case alignment. Although it’s purely a style fix, improving this alignment fosters consistency and maintainability:- switch result { - case .success(let value): completion(.success(value)) - case .failure(let error): completion(.failure(error)) + switch result { + case .success(let value): + completion(.success(value)) + case .failure(let error): + completion(.failure(error)) }🧰 Tools
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
[Warning] 90-90: Case statements should vertically aligned with their closing brace
(switch_case_alignment)
[Warning] 91-91: Case statements should vertically aligned with their closing brace
(switch_case_alignment)
115-137: Consider deprecating the old completion flow if no longer needed.
This wrapper transition is well-structured. Over time, you may want to fully migrate or marksendPushRegistrationas deprecated to encourage clients to adopt the new result-based method.🧰 Tools
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
[Warning] 131-131: Line should be 120 characters or less; currently it has 128 characters
(line_length)
[Warning] 122-122: Case statements should vertically aligned with their closing brace
(switch_case_alignment)
[Warning] 128-128: Case statements should vertically aligned with their closing brace
(switch_case_alignment)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Sources/UBPush/UBPushRegistrationManager.swift(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
Sources/UBPush/UBPushRegistrationManager.swift
[Warning] 96-96: Force unwrapping should be avoided
(force_unwrapping)
[Warning] 90-90: Case statements should vertically aligned with their closing brace
(switch_case_alignment)
[Warning] 91-91: Case statements should vertically aligned with their closing brace
(switch_case_alignment)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Sources/UBPush/UBPushRegistrationManager.swift (2)
81-83: Great use of Swift'sResulttype to capture success or failure.
This updated signature provides more structured error handling and simplifies the calling code.
102-103: Preserving older method ensures backward compatibility.
Maintaining this private method is a practical way to support existing calls while introducing the improved API. No immediate issues found.
| if task != nil { | ||
| modifyRegistrationDataTask(&task!) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| task?.start() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid force unwrapping task!.
Even with the preceding check if task != nil, it’s safer to use optional binding to prevent accidental crashes if someone refactors the code later.
-if task != nil {
- modifyRegistrationDataTask(&task!)
-}
+if var dataTask = task {
+ modifyRegistrationDataTask(&dataTask)
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if task != nil { | |
| modifyRegistrationDataTask(&task!) | |
| } | |
| task?.start() | |
| } | |
| if var dataTask = task { | |
| modifyRegistrationDataTask(&dataTask) | |
| } | |
| task?.start() | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 SwiftLint (0.57.0)
[Warning] 96-96: Force unwrapping should be avoided
(force_unwrapping)
| @@ -78,13 +78,29 @@ open class UBPushRegistrationManager: NSObject { | |||
| sendPushRegistration(completion: completion) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| /// :nodoc: | |||
| private func sendPushRegistration(completion: (@Sendable (Error?) -> Void)? = nil) { | |||
| open func sendPushRegistrationRequest(completion: (@escaping @Sendable (Result<String, Error>) -> Void)) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Muss das open sein oder reicht auch public? Resp. wollen wir das jemals überschreiben (bei Post rufen wir diese Methode einfach separat auf, oder?).
Falls open, müssten wir evt. noch eine Funktion machen, die den backgroundTask beenden kann, damit wirs auch von aussen machen können und nicht vergessen geht.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
die Idee war, dass man sendPushRegistrationRequest überschreiben kann und damit die logik, wie requests abgesetzt werden. sendPushRegistration hingegen ist private, damit man die logik vom background task nicht ändern kann.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor