OSDI changes + loop clean up #8
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Fixed bug in matrix_utils that was causing block_idxs functions to be incorrect * Fixed lambdapack program compilation to use hashtables instead of n^2 pass * Enforced executor test cholesky correctness.
|
Is this branch I should use instead of master? Seems this repo is silent for a while. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
huge PR but I rather get this on master sooner rather than later. This way vipul can use this, and it'll force us to get our shit together. @Karl-Krauth can you review plz. Last I checked all tests except forward/backsolve pass. But that needs an efficient tree-reduce which I am currently working on...