Skip to content

Snowflake Connector .NET does not properly check the Certificate Revocation List (CRL)

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Dec 22, 2023 in snowflakedb/snowflake-connector-net • Updated Dec 22, 2023

Package

nuget Snowflake.Data (NuGet)

Affected versions

>= 2.0.25, <= 2.1.4

Patched versions

2.1.5

Description

Issue

Snowflake recently received a report about a vulnerability in the Snowflake Connector .NET where the checks against the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) were not performed where the insecureMode flag was set to false, which is the default setting. The vulnerability affects versions between 2.0.25 and 2.1.4 (inclusive). Snowflake fixed the issue in version 2.1.5.

Attack Scenario

Snowflake uses CRL to check if a TLS certificate has been revoked before its expiration date. The lack of correct validation of revoked certificates could, in theory, allow an attacker who has both access to the private key of a correctly issued Snowflake certificate and the ability to intercept network traffic to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack in order to compromise Snowflake credentials used by the driver.

The vulnerability is difficult to exploit given both conditions required and, at the time of this advisory's publication, Snowflake is not aware of any compromise of its certificates, nor unauthorized issuance of such by any publicly trusted Certificate Authority (CA). However, an upgrade to the newest version is recommended to ensure the highest level of security and protection against future unforeseen threats.

Solution

On December 18, 2023, Snowflake released version 2.1.5 of the Snowflake Connector .NET, which fixes the issue, and we recommend users upgrade to version 2.1.5. Customers continuing to use the impacted versions of the connector should update their insecureMode flag to true.

Acknowledgement

Snowflake would like to thank Timo Vink for reporting this vulnerability.

Additional Information

If you discover a security vulnerability in one of our products or websites, please report the issue to HackerOne. For more information, please see our Vulnerability Disclosure Policy.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Dec 22, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Dec 22, 2023
Reviewed Dec 22, 2023
Last updated Dec 22, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

0.050%
(21st percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-51662

GHSA ID

GHSA-hwcc-4cv8-cf3h

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.