-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert test of #10267 #10323
Revert test of #10267 #10323
Conversation
This reverts commit 1c84ce4.
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #10323 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 15.16% 15.12% -0.05%
+ Complexity 11306 11303 -3
============================================
Files 5408 5409 +1
Lines 473948 476627 +2679
Branches 57851 58480 +629
============================================
+ Hits 71883 72098 +215
- Misses 394029 396473 +2444
- Partials 8036 8056 +20
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12326 |
@blueorangutan test matrix |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (EL8 mgmt + EL8 KVM, Ubuntu22 mgmt + Ubuntu22 KVM, EL8 mgmt + VMware 7.0u3, EL9 mgmt + XCP-ng 8.2 ) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12297)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12299)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12298)
|
@DaanHoogland I think we can proceed with this. Though I feel #10267 probably wasn't the reason for whole test suite failure but based on #10324 (comment) I think there is a behavioural change which is causing |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12300)
|
ok @shwstppr , I will still want to see #10267 results as #10322 doesn't show these results. cc @weizhouapache @JoaoJandre |
as showing the results of #10267 (comment) is not the reason either. closing this one. |
@DaanHoogland can we say #10267 caused the test failures ? |
@weizhouapache the results of #10267 (comment) show that #10267 does not have the same 47/57 long list of failures and we need to keep looking #10267 (comment) |
the massive test failures seen in some tests are intermitted I think. I was talking about the test failure |
ok, after backtalk with @shwstppr and @weizhouapache I am merging this. |
|
Reverts #10267 "server: fix attach uploaded volume"