Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix](profile) only printed for non-sink nodes in the merge profile. #44040

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Mryange
Copy link
Contributor

@Mryange Mryange commented Nov 15, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

In the past, the result sink did not have a plan node ID, which led to incorrect plan info being output.
Now, the plan info for sinks is not printed.

before

MergedProfile  
          Fragments:
              Fragment  0:
                  Pipeline  :  0(instance_num=1):
                        -  WaitWorkerTime:  avg  30.984us,  max  30.984us,  min  30.984us
                      RESULT_SINK_OPERATOR  (id=0):
                            -  PlanInfo
                                  -  TABLE:  test.big_string_table(big_string_table),  PREAGGREGATION:  ON
                                  -  partitions=1/1  (big_string_table)
                                  -  tablets=3/3,  tabletList=113264,113266,113268
                                  -  cardinality=131072,  avgRowSize=13.638229,  numNodes=1
                                  -  pushAggOp=COUNT
                                  -  projections:  1
                                  -  project  output  tuple  id:  1
                          OLAP_SCAN_OPERATOR  (id=0.  nereids_id=156.  table  name  =  big_string_table(big_string_table)):

now

MergedProfile  
          Fragments:
              Fragment  0:
                  Pipeline  :  0(instance_num=1):
                        -  WaitWorkerTime:  avg  32.576us,  max  32.576us,  min  32.576us
                      RESULT_SINK_OPERATOR  (id=0):
                          OLAP_SCAN_OPERATOR  (id=0.  nereids_id=156.  table  name  =  big_string_table(big_string_table)):
                                -  PlanInfo
                                      -  TABLE:  test.big_string_table(big_string_table),  PREAGGREGATION:  ON
                                      -  partitions=1/1  (big_string_table)
                                      -  tablets=3/3,  tabletList=113264,113266,113268
                                      -  cardinality=131072,  avgRowSize=0.0,  numNodes=1
                                      -  pushAggOp=COUNT
                                      -  projections:  1
                                      -  project  output  tuple  id:  1

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@Mryange
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mryange commented Nov 15, 2024

run buildall

1 similar comment
@Mryange
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mryange commented Nov 15, 2024

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants