Doc: Stack overflow check

[W-M-R]

Note: Please adhere to Contributing Guidelines.

Summary

Docu: Stack overflow check

Impact

Update this section, where applicable, on how change affects users,
build process, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility, etc.

Testing

Update this section with details on how did you verify the change,
what Host was used for build (OS, CPU, compiler, ..), what Target was
used for verification (arch, board:config, ..), etc. Providing build
and runtime logs from before and after change is highly appreciated.

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a title related to stack overflow checking in the documentation, it lacks crucial information.

Here's what's missing:

• Summary: It needs a detailed explanation of why the documentation change is necessary (e.g., was it incorrect, missing, or unclear?). It also needs to describe what exactly changed in the documentation (e.g., added a section on stack overflow checking, clarified existing information, fixed an error).
• Impact: The impact section is completely empty. At minimum, it should state "NO" for all impact categories if there is truly no impact. Even for documentation changes, there might be impact (e.g., clarifying something that could affect how users configure their systems). If the documentation clarifies how to prevent stack overflows, then there is arguably a security impact.
• Testing: The testing section is also empty. While documentation changes don't require the same level of testing as code changes, there should be some verification. For example, "Verified that the updated documentation renders correctly and is consistent with the code." If there are code changes associated with this documentation update (even in a separate PR), it should be mentioned here.

In short, the PR needs to be much more descriptive to meet the requirements. Just stating the title of the change isn't enough. The reviewer needs context to understand the purpose and validate the change.

[xiaoxiang781216]

please fix ci error, @W-M-R