Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RANGER-5148: Fix redundant role cache modify triggered by role versio… #538
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RANGER-5148: Fix redundant role cache modify triggered by role versio… #538
Changes from 1 commit
160d271
7203af9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ret
should be updated inelse
clause, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The variable "ret" has already been initialized and the cache has been retrieved once at line 76. There is no need to retrieve the cache repeatedly, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ret
initialized in line 76 is an older version, hence theif
block at line 78 is entered. Consider 2 threads:ret
is initialized to version=100; acquired lock at line 81ret
is initialized to version=100; waiting for the lock at line 81roleCacheWrapper
andret
to the latest version, say 101, at line 85; releases the lockroleCacheWrapper
has the lastest version; skips line 85; leavesret
at version 100The call from thread-2 will return version 100; the expected version is 101. Makes sense?