Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update odroidxu4-current to 6.6.75 #7787

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

belegdol
Copy link
Collaborator

@belegdol belegdol commented Feb 6, 2025

Description

Update odroidxu4-current kernel to 6.6.75.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Reboot of my Odroid HC1

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@belegdol belegdol requested a review from joekhoobyar as a code owner February 6, 2025 12:29
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/large PR with 250 lines or more Needs review Seeking for review Hardware Hardware related like kernel, U-Boot, ... Patches Patches related to kernel, U-Boot, ... labels Feb 6, 2025
@igorpecovnik
Copy link
Member

Did you perhaps tried some kernel 6.12.y on this device?

@igorpecovnik igorpecovnik added Ready to merge Reviewed, tested and ready for merge 02 Milestone: First quarter release and removed Needs review Seeking for review labels Feb 6, 2025
@belegdol
Copy link
Collaborator Author

belegdol commented Feb 6, 2025

Did you perhaps tried some kernel 6.12.y on this device?

I didn't, sorry. I only have one device which I use as family NAS/Server so I am not that keen on experimenting too much.
6.6 is the latest from hardkernel and it is going to be supported until at least the end of next year. At this it becomes a more an more valid question how much sense does it make to run a 32 bit arm board. I already have to rebuild my docker images myself.

@igorpecovnik
Copy link
Member

igorpecovnik commented Feb 6, 2025

OK. There is no urgency. We are just in the process of moving to 6.12.y ... what can be moved. If not, not a big issue. Thanks!

Yeah, and support for 32b is falling apart, agree. Most of interesting Docker images are n/a.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
02 Milestone: First quarter release Hardware Hardware related like kernel, U-Boot, ... Patches Patches related to kernel, U-Boot, ... Ready to merge Reviewed, tested and ready for merge size/large PR with 250 lines or more
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants