add-condition-for-cloning-system-tests

[vatsrahul1001]

PR introduced a new step of cloning airflow and system test in a reusable wf here. As it is a reusable workflow it's used in astronomer-providers-logging wf which started failing also we do not need that step in logging providers tests. This PR address this issue by running step only when repo is astronomer-providers

[pankajkoti]

It feels a bit odd to add a condition here to check if this workflow, which is already in this repo, is run from the same repo. If the workflow were stored in a shared location and referenced by multiple repos, the condition would make sense. For now, I think it would be better to copy the workflow to the logging provider repo where it's actually being used, rather than adding this condition here. What do you think?

[vatsrahul1001]

It feels a bit odd to add a condition here to check if this workflow, which is already in this repo, is run from the same repo. If the workflow were stored in a shared location and referenced by multiple repos, the condition would make sense. For now, I think it would be better to copy the workflow to the logging provider repo where it's actually being used, rather than adding this condition here. What do you think?

I agree better would be to copy workflow to logging provider. I will close this PR and open a new one in logging provider