Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(spell-check): replace spell-check dictionaries to use AWf repositories #312

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

Description

This modifies spell-check actions to use the dictionaries from AWF repository instead of TIER IV dictionaries so that we have full control over addition/deletion of words in the dictionaries without waiting approval from TIER IV.

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Interface changes

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@mitsudome-r mitsudome-r requested a review from xmfcx August 27, 2024 08:39
Copy link

@Shin-kyoto Shin-kyoto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!! LGTM.
Can you change this workflow to required?

Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 28, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.

@stale stale bot added the status:stale label Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants