Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new rules for SQS queue #3952

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

kddejong
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available:
fix #3950
Description of changes:

  • Add new rules for SQS queue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@kddejong kddejong force-pushed the fix/issue/3950 branch 2 times, most recently from f7bd058 to 290b0f9 Compare February 10, 2025 18:35
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.82%. Comparing base (53ac0a5) to head (8ac43ee).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3952      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.80%   93.82%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         370      372       +2     
  Lines       12719    12777      +58     
  Branches     2616     2628      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits        11931    11988      +57     
  Misses        437      437              
- Partials      351      352       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 93.78% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kddejong kddejong merged commit 695e607 into aws-cloudformation:main Feb 11, 2025
25 checks passed
@kddejong kddejong deleted the fix/issue/3950 branch February 11, 2025 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQS Queue and attached DLQ should have same type
1 participant