-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release new crate versions #700
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Daniel Carl Jones <[email protected]>
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 10:17 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
had a problem deploying
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 10:17 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 10:17 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 10:17 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 10:17 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 10:17 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 10:17 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
commented
Jan 12, 2024
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 11:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 11:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 11:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 11:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 11:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 11:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 12, 2024 11:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
passaro
previously approved these changes
Jan 12, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
monthonk
previously approved these changes
Jan 15, 2024
Signed-off-by: Daniel Carl Jones <[email protected]>
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 17, 2024 12:31 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 17, 2024 12:31 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 17, 2024 12:31 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
had a problem deploying
to
PR integration tests
January 17, 2024 12:31 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 17, 2024 12:31 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
had a problem deploying
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:46 — with
GitHub Actions
Error
dannycjones
had a problem deploying
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:46 — with
GitHub Actions
Error
dannycjones
had a problem deploying
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:46 — with
GitHub Actions
Error
Signed-off-by: Daniel Carl Jones <[email protected]>
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:49 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:49 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:49 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:49 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
had a problem deploying
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:49 — with
GitHub Actions
Failure
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:49 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 13:49 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Crate checks are expected to fail and are non-blocking: #658 |
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 14:11 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 14:11 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 14:11 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 14:11 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 14:11 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 14:12 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
dannycjones
temporarily deployed
to
PR integration tests
January 18, 2024 14:12 — with
GitHub Actions
Inactive
monthonk
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
jamesbornholt
added a commit
to jamesbornholt/mountpoint-s3
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
This workflow exists because we're worried about the 10MiB limit. The sys crate is the only one that's in any danger of hitting that limit because it's packaging a ton of C code, including an entire TLS implementation. This workflow is also broken (awslabs#700) when updating crate versions for multiple crates at the same time, which we really want to do. Since we only care about the size of the sys crate, let's only check that one. Signed-off-by: James Bornholt <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
This workflow exists because we're worried about the 10MiB limit. The sys crate is the only one that's in any danger of hitting that limit because it's packaging a ton of C code, including an entire TLS implementation. This workflow is also broken (#700) when updating crate versions for multiple crates at the same time, which we really want to do. Since we only care about the size of the sys crate, let's only check that one. Signed-off-by: James Bornholt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of change
There's not many changes here, but let's get what we have out.
Relevant issues: N/A
Does this change impact existing behavior?
This change itself? No.
The crate releases however include one breaking change for
mountpoint-s3-crt
: "Return type ofcommon::Uri::host_port
changed fromu16
tou32
".Open question: should this be a minor rather than patch update for
mountpoint-s3-crt
version?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and I agree to the terms of the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO).