remove vidru3

[solpahi]

New definition:
x1 is a virus of species/breed/defining property x2

[durka]

discussion at #15

[adamlopresto]

A virus isn't an animal, and whether it's alive on its own is debatable. Having a place for the type of living thing whose cells it hijacks to replicate seems like a natural fit. Leave it alone.

[lagleki]

Viruses just can't live without infecting anyone. However, many
animals/plants are essentially parasites. What is more, in many cases you
can't decide what is a parasitism, what is a simple symbiosis and what is
just using up natural resources like the sun light.
E.g. we could imagine

guslatna = x1 is a lotus using for its photosynthesis light x2 (e.g. a set
of wavelengths) from the source x3 (the Sun by default).

You can't deny that without light lotuses can't exist.

2014-05-29 1:41 GMT+04:00 adamlopresto [email protected]:

A virus isn't an animal, and whether it's alive on its own is debatable.
Having a place for the type of living thing whose cells it hijacks to
replicate seems like a natural fit. Leave it alone.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/19#issuecomment-44468380
.

[dustinlacewell]

@adamlopresto Agreed with your observation about viruses however the specifics of that virus can be described in the x2 property.