Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(acquisition): Improve readability of GET journey #2733

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hugobarthelemy
Copy link
Contributor

@hugobarthelemy hugobarthelemy commented Dec 17, 2024

Description

Précision de l'OpenAPI :

  • status du trajet : ordonnancement par ordre alphabétique pour les différentes listes afin que cela soit plus simple de vérifier la cohérence liste VS définition
  • distance_too_short : précision que le calcule est fait à vol d'oiseau et non par résolution OSRM qui pourrait engendrer des incohérence entre le calcule réalisé par le RPC et celui fait par l'opérateur (tous les opérateurs n'utilisent pas forcément OSRM, pas forcément avec la même configuration, pas forcément la même version des maps etc...)

Checklist

Merge

Je squash la PR et vérifie que le message de commit utilise la convention d'Angular :

Voir la convention de message de commit...
<type>(<scope>): <short summary>
  │       │             │
  │       │             └─⫸ Summary in present tense. Not capitalized. No period at the end.
  │       │
  │       └─⫸ Commit Scope: proxy|acquisition|export|...
  │
  └─⫸ Commit Type: build|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|test

Types de commit

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
  • ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (examples: Github Actions)
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature (Minor bump)
  • fix: A bug fix (Patch bump)
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Le scope (optionnel) précise le module ou le composant impacté par le commit.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new endpoint to cancel journeys.
    • Expanded the status schema with additional values for better error handling.
  • Documentation

    • Updated API documentation for improved clarity and usability.
    • Marked the certificates endpoint for deprecation in future versions.
    • Enhanced response examples and error messages for better user understanding.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the OpenAPI specification for the "Registre de preuve de covoiturage" API from version 3.0.3 to 3.1. The changes focus on enhancing API documentation, adding a new journey cancellation endpoint, updating status schemas, and improving error handling. The specification now provides more detailed information about API operations, with clearer descriptions, new enum values, and refined endpoint definitions to support better interaction and error management.

Changes

File Change Summary
api/specs/api-v3.1.yaml - Updated OpenAPI version to 3.1
- Added new POST /journeys/{operator_journey_id}/cancel endpoint
- Updated status schema with new enum values canceled and validation_error
- Marked POST /certificates endpoint for deprecation in version 3.2
- Enhanced response examples and error messages

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Operator
    participant API
    Operator->>API: POST /journeys/{operator_journey_id}/cancel
    API-->>Operator: Return cancellation status
    Note over API: Validate cancellation request
    API->>Operator: Confirm journey cancellation
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🚗 A rabbit's ode to API delight,
Journeys canceled with technical might!
Version 3.1 brings clarity so bright,
Endpoints dancing with error's new height,
OpenAPI specs now shine just right! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
api/specs/api-v3.1.yaml (1)

1247-1267: LGTM! The status values are now alphabetically ordered.

The changes improve readability by:

  1. Organizing status values alphabetically
  2. Adding clear descriptions for each status
  3. Correctly documenting that distance_too_short is based on straight-line distance

Consider adding examples in the description to help API consumers better understand when each status might occur. For instance:

          - `validation_error` : les données envoyées ne sont pas valides
+         Example: Missing required fields, invalid phone number format, etc.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99e4fca and e81bac5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • api/specs/api-v3.1.yaml (2 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant