Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(SPV-1469): add linter stage in examples #323

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

dzolt-4chain
Copy link
Contributor

@dzolt-4chain dzolt-4chain commented Jan 31, 2025

Pull Request Checklist

  • πŸ“– I created my PR using provided : CODE_STANDARDS
  • πŸ“– I have read the short Code of Conduct: CODE_OF_CONDUCT
  • 🏠 I tested my changes locally.
  • βœ… I have provided tests for my changes.
  • πŸ“ I have used conventional commits.
  • πŸ“— I have updated any related documentation.
  • πŸ’Ύ PR was issued based on the Github or Jira issue.

@dzolt-4chain dzolt-4chain requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2025 16:00
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Manual Tests

πŸ’š Manual testing by @chris-4chain resulted in success.

@dzolt-4chain dzolt-4chain changed the title feat(SPV-1469): add linter config with purposeful lint error in acces… feat(SPV-1469): add linter stage in examples Jan 31, 2025
@dzolt-4chain dzolt-4chain force-pushed the feat/SPV-1469/add_linter_in_examples branch from 71753fd to abc52f4 Compare February 3, 2025 10:12
.github/workflows/run-tests.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/run-tests.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@chris-4chain chris-4chain added the tested PR was tested by a team member label Feb 11, 2025
@dzolt-4chain dzolt-4chain merged commit 27c7fcd into main Feb 11, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
@dzolt-4chain dzolt-4chain deleted the feat/SPV-1469/add_linter_in_examples branch February 11, 2025 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tested PR was tested by a team member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants