upstream: merge branch 'geth-master-02-11' into bsc-develop #2888
+417
−63
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
After recent changes in Geth (removing TD): ethereum/go-ethereum@39638c8#diff-d70a44d4b7a0e84fe9dcca25d368f626ae6c9bc0b8fe9690074ba92d298bcc0d Non-Geth clients are failing many devp2p tests with an error: `peering failed: status exchange failed: wrong TD in status: have 1 want 0` Right now only Geth is passing it - all other clients are affected by this change. I think there should be no validation of TD when checking `Status` message in hive tests. Now Geth has 0 (and hive tests requires 0) and all other clients have actual TD. And on real networks there is no validation of TD when peering
Agreed to the following fork dates for Holesky and Sepolia on ACDC 150 Holesky slot: 3710976 (Mon, Feb 24 at 21:55:12 UTC) Sepolia slot: 7118848 (Wed, Mar 5 at 07:29:36 UTC)
This removes the method `TestingTTDBlock` introduced by #30744. It was added to make the beacon consensus engine aware of the merge block in tests without relying on the total difficulty. However, tracking the merge block this way is very annoying. We usually configure forks in the `ChainConfig`, but the method is on the consensus engine, which isn't always created in the same place. By sidestepping the `ChainConfig` we don't get the usual fork-order checking, so it's possible to enable the merge before the London fork, for example. This in turn can lead to very hard-to-debug outputs and validation errors. So here I'm changing the consensus engine to check the `MergeNetsplitBlock` instead. Alternatively, we assume a network is merged if it has a `TerminalTotalDifficulty` of zero, which is a very common configuration in tests.
The new SetCode transaction type introduces some additional complexity when handling the transaction pool. This complexity stems from two new account behaviors: 1. The balance and nonce of an account can change during regular transaction execution *when they have a deployed delegation*. 2. The nonce and code of an account can change without any EVM execution at all. This is the "set code" mechanism introduced by EIP-7702. The first issue has already been considered extensively during the design of ERC-4337, and we're relatively confident in the solution of simply limiting the number of in-flight pending transactions an account can have to one. This puts a reasonable bound on transaction cancellation. Normally to cancel, you would need to spend 21,000 gas. Now it's possible to cancel for around the cost of warming the account and sending value (`2,600+9,000=11,600`). So 50% cheaper. The second issue is more novel and needs further consideration. Since authorizations are not bound to a specific transaction, we cannot drop transactions with conflicting authorizations. Otherwise, it might be possible to cherry-pick authorizations from txs and front run them with different txs at much lower fee amounts, effectively DoSing the authority. Fortunately, conflicting authorizations do not affect the underlying validity of the transaction so we can just accept both. --------- Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <[email protected]>
Fixes an error when the block is not found in debug methods.
setunapo
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2025
zzzckck
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2025
zlacfzy
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2025
This was referenced Feb 13, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
upstream: merge branch 'geth-master-02-11' into bsc-develop
Rationale
need PR
core/txpool/legacypool: add support for SetCode transactions (#31073)in prague upgradeExample
add an example CLI or API response...
Changes
Notable changes: