Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand security considerations #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Expand security considerations #4

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bremoran
Copy link
Owner

Resolves comments from IETF115:

DT: How might you carry a SUIT report in an EAT?
Brendan: We need to define a new EAT claim for this for a SUIT report.

DT: Do you encrypt the SUIT report or use an EAT encrypted EAT?
HB: We should not assume that EAT will always have responsibility for encryption
Brendan: What do we do when the SUIT report is not sent in an EAT?
DT: In security consideration, we should discuss individually encrypting multiple items, or encrypting all the items as an encrypted EAT. This should be documented in EAT.

MR: What about privacy considerations? How do we handle a status tracker that needs this information? Is there a need to recharter for this?
Brendan: Alternative: TEEP doesn’t restrict use to only a TEE. A status tracker could use this information.

DT: What do supported identifiers mean for a non-constrained device?
Brendan: Wildcards can be used for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant