fix script

_content/monographs/legibility-of-serif-and-sans-serif_richardson-john-t-e.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+---
+title: "The Legibility of Serif and Sans Serif Typefaces"
+authors:
+  - "John T. E. Richardson"
+external_url: "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90984-0"
+drive_links:
+  - "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1umVu3NtZa-vwzVAqEfCA5ZN1yK184X4w/view?usp=drivesdk"
+  - "https://drive.google.com/file/d/156j1jbfXh2XUL2CVzaeAe2pdFjXWW1qv/view?usp=drivesdk"
+tags:
+  - graphic-design
+  - typography
+year: 2022
+olid: OL35866465M
+pages: 132
+publisher: "Springer Nature"
+address: "Netherlands"
+openalexid: W4293192437
+---
+
+> There is no difference in the legibility of serif and sans serif typefaces either when reading from paper or when reading from screens.
+
+Designers should feel free to use either a serif or a sans serif font, "even if legibility is a key criterion in their choice."

_data/drive_folders.json

@@ -1483,6 +1483,10 @@
   "private": "https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/159o1bq04DRMMbF4vLuIjz2r47xrSpsqK",
   "public": "https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1L7kkMipRUwgQIlb3Jorwao5pPz__qZPs"
  },
+ "stats": {
+  "private": "https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xguUvm40c-Nz91tfExVsNehsu1-5bCsd",
+  "public": null
+ },
  "surveillance": {
   "private": "https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wl9WN4S1nQOMLtFsSCtGksVEpQll9h2K",
   "public": ""

scripts/openaleximporter.py

@@ -107,8 +107,12 @@ def make_library_entry_for_work(work, draft=False, course=None, glink='') -> str
     pass
   filename += '.md'
   file_path = os.path.join(file_path, filename)
+  title = title.replace('"', '\\\"')
   with open(file_path, 'w') as fd:
-    fd.write(f"---\ntitle: \"{title.replace('"', '\\\"')}\"\nauthors:\n")
+    fd.write(f"""---
+title: "{title}"
+authors:
+""")
     for i in range(min(4, len(work['authorships']))):
         author = work['authorships'][i]['author']['display_name'].replace('‐', '-')
         aslug = get_author_slug(author)