Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: initial setup of tension module in pypilecore #103

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

RDWimmers
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@RDWimmers RDWimmers requested a review from tlukkezen October 14, 2024 09:44
@RDWimmers RDWimmers self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 14, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13327381540

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 158 unchanged lines in 9 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-1.5%) to 84.855%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
viewers/interactive_figures/utils.py 1 87.5%
results/result_definitions.py 3 97.09%
results/soil_properties.py 9 96.23%
common/piles/type.py 12 85.06%
common/piles/geometry/materials.py 15 73.21%
input/soil_properties.py 15 72.88%
common/piles/main.py 21 50.88%
results/grouper_result.py 24 87.89%
api.py 58 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12710845442: -1.5%
Covered Lines: 2314
Relevant Lines: 2727

💛 - Coveralls

@RDWimmers RDWimmers force-pushed the feat-add-tension-module branch from 6e0ba72 to e213b37 Compare February 5, 2025 08:06
@RDWimmers RDWimmers dismissed tlukkezen’s stale review February 14, 2025 10:38

put in separated PR

@RDWimmers RDWimmers marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2025 10:38
@RDWimmers RDWimmers merged commit e6a3ea4 into main Feb 14, 2025
20 checks passed
@RDWimmers RDWimmers deleted the feat-add-tension-module branch February 14, 2025 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants