-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add test for loadbalancing route option #1424
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
test: add test for loadbalancing route option #1424
Conversation
9e76848
to
2474f7a
Compare
Co-Authored-By: Clemens Hoffmann <[email protected]>
2b9cfcf
to
1bbf1e8
Compare
Those things are mostly leftovers from our testing to figure out what was wrong. I'll clean them up. |
Once we are happy with the code we can have another test run to ensure everything still works properly. @ctlong please have another look. |
d84ab98
to
d95d949
Compare
Thanks! @iaftab-alam ran the tests again and they pass so this is good to merge from our side. |
LGTM! Can you please record how many minutes this will increase CATs runs? You can do this by comparing the previous runtime of the routing test suite with the runtime of the new routing test suite, using around 12 parallel nodes. And can you also list the CF-D version that you ran this against? Actually... does this require some minimum CF-D/CAPI version? |
Are you submitting this PR against the develop branch?
All PR's to CATs should be submitted to develop and will be merged to main once they've passed acceptance.
What is this change about?
Add an acceptance test for per-route options as described in #1352.
Please provide contextual information.
#1352, cloudfoundry/community#909
What version of cf-deployment have you run this cf-acceptance-test change against?
Please check all that apply for this PR:
Did you update the README as appropriate for this change?
If you are introducing a new acceptance test, what is your rationale for including it CATs rather than your own acceptance test suite?
It tests the E2E functionality of per-route options. Each component has its own acceptance tests but we want to ensure that the E2E scenario works with every released cf-d.
How many more (or fewer) seconds of runtime will this change introduce to CATs?
Unknown
What is the level of urgency for publishing this change?
Tag your pair, your PM, and/or team!