Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed Code of Conduct Updates for January 2025 #941

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jeremyrickard
Copy link
Contributor

The CNCF Code of Conduct Committee is proposing a change to the Code of Conduct to prevent use of CNCF projects and CNCF community spaces for political campaigning or promotion of political causes that are unrelated to tech.

As a community that exists for the purpose of promoting cloud native technology, unrelated political causes are outside our scope. In the past, use of CNCF community spaces to promote unrelated political causes has proven to be distracting and divisive, even when numerous community members feel passionate about the cause. There are more appropriate forums outside of CNCF for promotion of political causes.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Rickard <[email protected]>
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior include but are not limited to:
* Stalking or following someone without their consent
* Unwelcome physical contact
* Unwelcome sexual or romantic attention or advances
* Using CNCF projects or community spaces for political campaigning or promotion of political causes
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mostly nits!!

  1. drop space before "promotion"
  2. For clarity, this does not restrict individuals' personal attire could be phrased better. To clarify, this policy does not restrict individuals from expressing personal views through their attire perhaps?
  3. Drop "Please see the Code of Conduct FAQ for more information." as the faq does NOT yet cover attire (and we don't need to add that to all the lines, there's is separate FAQ section on line 96)
  4. Is there a PR for adding attire to FAQ already?

thanks @jeremyrickard !

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to @dims comments

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dims I pushed a new commit that I think addresses comments 1-3.

I don't believe we have added a PR for the FAQ change. Let me verify if we have that ready to go and I'll handle it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @jeremyrickard !

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@TheFoxAtWork TheFoxAtWork left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This Looks good, if we could adjust the personal attire language to be more clear as suggested by @dims ?

@mrbobbytables does this change require a formal vote by the TOC or is our approval on the PR sufficient as a major change?

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Rickard <[email protected]>
@mrbobbytables
Copy link
Member

Approval of the PR from the TOC members should be sufficient - we just need a record of approval

Copy link
Contributor

@angellk angellk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm - thanks for the update @jeremyrickard

angellk

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Copy link

@kgamanji kgamanji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rochaporto
Copy link

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@TheFoxAtWork TheFoxAtWork left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@kevin-wangzefeng
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@johananl
Copy link

Nice idea. While we're at it, have we considered adding "political stance" to the list of dimensions of diversity? Looks like an important omission to me.

We are committed to making participation in the CNCF community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, caste, disability, ethnicity, level of experience, family status, gender, gender identity and expression, marital status, military or veteran status, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, tribe, or any other dimension of diversity.

Copy link

@dzolotusky dzolotusky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mrbobbytables
Copy link
Member

We have enough approvals from the TOC, this can now be merged.

@johananl
Copy link

Nice idea. While we're at it, have we considered adding "political stance" to the list of dimensions of diversity? Looks like an important omission to me.

I guess that's a no...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.