Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MAP RichardsonLucy #259

Open
wants to merge 26 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

hiyoneda
Copy link
Contributor

I added a new image deconvolution algorithm, MAP Richardson-Lucy. It is based on Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) Estimation, and the RL algorithm is modified to include prior distributions flexibly.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.85315% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.51%. Comparing base (b9ac312) to head (d577f15).
Report is 77 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...mage_deconvolution/deconvolution_algorithm_base.py 88.57% 4 Missing ⚠️
cosipy/image_deconvolution/RichardsonLucy.py 94.11% 2 Missing ⚠️
cosipy/image_deconvolution/RichardsonLucySimple.py 94.73% 2 Missing ⚠️
cosipy/image_deconvolution/MAP_RichardsonLucy.py 99.22% 1 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
cosipy/image_deconvolution/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cosipy/image_deconvolution/dataIF_COSI_DC2.py 90.83% <100.00%> (ø)
cosipy/image_deconvolution/image_deconvolution.py 96.00% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
...olution/image_deconvolution_data_interface_base.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cosipy/image_deconvolution/model_base.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
cosipy/image_deconvolution/prior_base.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cosipy/image_deconvolution/prior_tsv.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cosipy/image_deconvolution/MAP_RichardsonLucy.py 99.22% <99.22%> (ø)
cosipy/image_deconvolution/RichardsonLucy.py 97.67% <94.11%> (+1.64%) ⬆️
cosipy/image_deconvolution/RichardsonLucySimple.py 94.11% <94.73%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
... and 1 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant