Job nested process workflow

[fmigneault]

• fixes support the Nested Processes as process: <uri> construct #747
• relates to Support OGC-API Processes - Part 3: Workflows #412
• depends on implement part 4 job management - job creation and results trigger #742
• fixes GD-567
• fixes OGC09-18

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.03960% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.40%. Comparing base (0f61ab2) to head (edd3abc).
Report is 33 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
weaver/processes/wps_process_base.py	84.61%	2 Missing ⚠️
weaver/wps_restapi/colander_extras.py	96.92%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
weaver/database/__init__.py	87.50%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
weaver/processes/builtin/collection_processor.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
weaver/processes/execution.py	97.72%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
weaver/wps_restapi/swagger_definitions.py	97.87%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #748      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.07%   87.40%   +0.33%     
==========================================
  Files          80       80              
  Lines       20395    21312     +917     
  Branches     2774     2954     +180     
==========================================
+ Hits        17758    18627     +869     
- Misses       1900     1921      +21     
- Partials      737      764      +27     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Nazim-crim]

lgtm

[Nazim-crim]

Isn't confusing calling it a bind if it's not a shallow copy ?
Shouldn't it be self.children = list(ExecuteProcessParameters().children)

[fmigneault]

Limitation from the parent colander library that called the method bind. Nested nodes have to be cloned, otherwise you could have by-ref conflicting updates if similar definitions are used simultaneously.

[fmigneault]

I've added a test in ef93c74 (#748) so you can get a better understanding of the feature and its behavior.

The base branch was changed.