Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Hax extract on different architectures #658

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jschneider-bensch
Copy link
Collaborator

This is to catch a potential feature misconfiguration during extraction.

@franziskuskiefer
Copy link
Member

@jschneider-bensch what's the state here? Looks like CI didn't go through.

@jschneider-bensch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Right, it looks like the Nix-based setup for hax on CI here does not work on all the platforms where I wanted to confirm we can extract, so I'll have to set up hax manually for these platforms.

I still think it would be good to know that extraction works on common platforms, but it would also be more churn on the CI, the way it is configured here. So I would actually like to run it on the merge queue instead. What do you think?

@franziskuskiefer
Copy link
Member

👍🏻 Yes, running it on the merge queue and without nix sounds good.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

This PR has been marked as stale due to a lack of activity for 60 days. If you believe this pull request is still relevant, please provide an update or comment to keep it open. Otherwise, it will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Feb 3, 2025
Copy link

This PR has been closed due to a lack of activity since being marked as stale. If you believe this pull request is still relevant, please reopen it with an update or comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants