Create Tweet Errors #202
Create Tweet Errors #202
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request implements error handling for the File-Level Changes
Tips
|
WalkthroughThe changes enhance error handling in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @manudev-1 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider raising exceptions directly in
create_tweetinstead of using a private_switch_errormethod. This would make the error handling more straightforward and easier to follow. - The docstring for
CreateTweetMaxLengthReachedinerrors.pyis incomplete and should be fixed.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
| @@ -4234,3 +4238,16 @@ async def _update_subscriptions( | |||
| async def _get_user_state(self) -> Literal['normal', 'bounced', 'suspended']: | |||
| response, _ = await self.v11.user_state() | |||
| return response['userState'] | |||
|
|
|||
| def _switch_error( | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Consider refactoring error handling logic
The current implementation of _switch_error mixes different responsibilities. Consider using a dictionary to map error messages to exception types, which would make it easier to maintain and extend in the future.
def _switch_error(self, response: dict) -> None:
error_map = {
'InvalidCredentials': InvalidCredentialsError,
'InvalidToken': InvalidTokenError,
'Unauthorized': UnauthorizedError,
# Add more mappings as needed
}
error_type = response.get('error', {}).get('type')
if error_type in error_map:
raise error_map[error_type](response['error']['message'])
raise TwikitError(response['error']['message'])
| elif "Tweet needs to be a bit shorter" in response['errors']['message']: | ||
| raise CreateTweetMaxLengthReached("Tweet needs to be a bit shorter") | ||
| # * Print <response> to reach unknown errors in 2024-09-04 | ||
| print(response) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Replace print with logging for unknown errors
Using print for logging unknown errors is not ideal for production code. Consider using a proper logging mechanism instead, which would provide more control over log levels and output destinations.
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (in the relevant function)
logger.error(f"Unknown error occurred: {response}")
twikit/errors.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| class CreateTweetMaxLengthReached(CreateTweetFailed): | ||
| """ | ||
| Exception raised when create_tweet try to c. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue: Complete the docstring for CreateTweetMaxLengthReached
The docstring for CreateTweetMaxLengthReached is incomplete. Please finish the sentence to clearly explain when this exception is raised.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
twikit/client/client.py (1)
Line range hint
1-1: TODO: Add testsIt's important to have tests for the code to ensure its correctness and maintainability. Please consider adding tests for this module.
Do you need any help with writing the tests? I can provide guidance or examples if needed. Let me know if you'd like me to open a GitHub issue to track this task.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- twikit/client/client.py (3 hunks)
- twikit/errors.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
twikit/errors.py (2)
97-100: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
102-105: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
twikit/errors.py
Outdated
| class CreateTweetMaxLengthReached(CreateTweetFailed): | ||
| """ | ||
| Exception raised when create_tweet try to c. | ||
| """ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the docstring to provide a clear description of the class.
The docstring is incomplete and does not provide a clear description of the class.
Apply this diff to update the docstring:
class CreateTweetMaxLengthReached(CreateTweetFailed):
"""
- Exception raised when create_tweet try to c.
+ Exception raised when create_tweet tries to create a tweet that exceeds the maximum allowed length.
"""Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| class CreateTweetMaxLengthReached(CreateTweetFailed): | |
| """ | |
| Exception raised when create_tweet try to c. | |
| """ | |
| class CreateTweetMaxLengthReached(CreateTweetFailed): | |
| """ | |
| Exception raised when create_tweet tries to create a tweet that exceeds the maximum allowed length. | |
| """ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- twikit/client/client.py (3 hunks)
- twikit/errors.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- twikit/client/client.py
- twikit/errors.py
|
@sourcery-ai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @manudev-1 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider refactoring the
_switch_errormethod to use a more robust approach for error handling, possibly using error codes instead of string matching. This would make the code less brittle and easier to maintain as new error types are added. - Replace the print statement for unknown errors with proper logging. This will make it easier to manage and control error output in different environments.
- Instead of using a TODO comment with a specific date, consider using your project's issue tracking system to manage future tasks and improvements.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- twikit/client/client.py (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- twikit/client/client.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
twikit/client/client.py (1)
1243-1244: Safely access 'data' key in response to prevent potential KeyErrorThe condition
if not response['data']:assumes thatresponsealways contains the'data'key. If'data'is not present, this will raise aKeyError. Consider usingif not response.get('data'):to handle cases where'data'might be missing.Apply this diff to safely check for 'data' in the response:
-if not response['data']: +if not response.get('data'): self._switch_error(response)
| message = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('message', '') | ||
| error_msg: str = message[message.index(": ")+2:message.index(". ")] | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error message parsing to prevent exceptions
Extracting error_msg using string slicing with message.index can raise a ValueError if the expected substrings ": " or ". " are not found in the message. This can occur if the error message format changes or is different than expected. Consider using safer methods like str.partition, str.split, or handling exceptions to avoid unexpected crashes.
Apply this diff to make error parsing more robust:
message = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('message', '')
-error_msg: str = message[message.index(": ")+2:message.index(". ")]
+colon_index = message.find(": ")
+period_index = message.find(". ")
+if colon_index != -1 and period_index != -1 and colon_index < period_index:
+ error_msg = message[colon_index + 2 : period_index]
+else:
+ error_msg = message📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| message = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('message', '') | |
| error_msg: str = message[message.index(": ")+2:message.index(". ")] | |
| message = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('message', '') | |
| colon_index = message.find(": ") | |
| period_index = message.find(". ") | |
| if colon_index != -1 and period_index != -1 and colon_index < period_index: | |
| error_msg = message[colon_index + 2 : period_index] | |
| else: | |
| error_msg = message | |
| message = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('message', '') | ||
| error_msg: str = message[message.index(": ")+2:message.index(". ")] | ||
|
|
||
| error_code = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('extensions', {}).get('code', '') | ||
| if error_code in error_map: | ||
| raise error_map[error_code](error_msg) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check for empty 'errors' list in response to avoid IndexError
The code assumes that response['errors'] contains at least one error. If the errors list is empty, accessing [0] will raise an IndexError. To prevent this, check if the list has elements before accessing the first one.
Apply this diff to safely access the error information:
-errors = response.get('errors', [])[0]
+errors = response.get('errors', [])
+if not errors:
+ # Handle case where errors list is empty
+ return
+error_info = errors[0]
-message = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('message', '')
+message = error_info.get('message', '')
+error_code = error_info.get('extensions', {}).get('code', '')Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| error_code = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('extensions', {}).get('code', '') | ||
| if error_code in error_map: | ||
| raise error_map[error_code](error_msg) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure error codes are consistently typed for correct mapping
The error_code extracted from the response is likely a string, whereas the keys in error_map are integers. This can cause the condition if error_code in error_map: to fail even when the code exists in the map. Consider converting error_code to an integer or changing the keys in error_map to strings to ensure proper exception handling.
Apply this diff to ensure consistent data types:
error_map = {
- 186: CreateTweetDuplicate,
- 187: CreateTweetMaxLengthReached
+ '186': CreateTweetDuplicate,
+ '187': CreateTweetMaxLengthReached
}
error_code = response.get('errors', [])[0].get('extensions', {}).get('code', '')Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Description
Context
This PR introduces error handling for the
create_tweetfunction. Currently, the function does not properly handle potential errors that may occur during tweet creation, such as the length of a tweet and the duplication of a tweet in a short period. This update aims to make the function more robust and improve overall reliability.Currently, the error provided when
create_tweetfails is aKeyErrorexception which is too general to troubleshoot, with this update we try to give more meaningful error to the developerChanges
_switch_error_switch_errorat the moment manage 2 exception (Duplicated tweet in short period of time, length of the tweet)responseto make sure that the developer notice the error and can report theknown issueerrors.pySummary by Sourcery
Implement error handling in the
create_tweetfunction by introducing specific exceptions for duplicate tweets and tweets exceeding maximum length, and adding a mechanism to handle and report unhandled errors.New Features:
create_tweetfunction to manage specific exceptions such as duplicate tweets and tweets exceeding maximum length.Enhancements:
_switch_errorto map specific error messages to custom exceptions and print the response for unhandled errors.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes