Update CreateTweet endpoint #290
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request updates the Sequence diagram for the updated CreateTweet endpointsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
Note over Client,API: New endpoint URL: UecQIuYzi2MCOah7-eOpcQ/CreateTweet
Client->>API: POST /CreateTweet
API-->>Client: Tweet Creation Response
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@phinwww has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @phinwww - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please add documentation explaining the reason for this endpoint URL update and whether it involves any breaking changes or compatibility considerations.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
twikit/client/gql.py (1)
37-37: Consider adding a version comment.Since the endpoint URL appears to be version-specific, consider adding a comment indicating when this URL was last updated to help track future changes.
- CREATE_TWEET = url('UecQIuYzi2MCOah7-eOpcQ/CreateTweet') + # Updated: January 2025 + CREATE_TWEET = url('UecQIuYzi2MCOah7-eOpcQ/CreateTweet')
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
twikit/client/gql.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
twikit/client/gql.py (1)
37-37: Verify the new endpoint URL functionality.The endpoint URL change appears to be a routine update. However, we should verify that the new endpoint is functional and maintains the same response structure.
✅ Verification successful
Endpoint URL change appears consistent and isolated
The endpoint URL update follows the established pattern used by other Twitter GraphQL endpoints in the codebase. No other files reference this endpoint, and the change maintains the same structure as other endpoints in the class (hash-like identifier followed by endpoint name).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any changes in endpoint usage or related test failures # Test 1: Check for any test files that might be affected echo "Checking for affected test files..." rg -l "CREATE_TWEET" --type python # Test 2: Check for any error handling specific to this endpoint echo "Checking for error handling related to CREATE_TWEET..." rg -B 3 -A 3 "UecQIuYzi2MCOah7-eOpcQ/CreateTweet" --type pythonLength of output: 360
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for both old and new endpoint URLs and CREATE_TWEET references echo "Searching for endpoint URLs and CREATE_TWEET references..." fd -e py -x rg -l "CREATE_TWEET|SiM_cAu83R0wnrpmKQQSEw/CreateTweet|UecQIuYzi2MCOah7-eOpcQ/CreateTweet" {} echo "Checking context around endpoint definitions..." fd -e py -x rg -B 5 -A 5 "CREATE_TWEET.*=.*url\(" {} echo "Looking for any test files..." fd -e py -g "*test*.py" -x rg -l "CREATE_TWEET" {}Length of output: 1201
think this should work now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
twikit/constants.py (2)
28-28: Remove trailing whitespace.There's an unnecessary trailing whitespace on this line.
- +
262-263: Maintain consistent spacing between dictionaries.Remove one empty line to maintain consistency with the rest of the file, which uses single empty lines between dictionaries.
- - +
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
twikit/client/gql.py(4 hunks)twikit/constants.py(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- twikit/client/gql.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
twikit/constants.py (1)
264-294: Verify feature flag changes impact.The new
CREATE_TWEET_FEATURESdictionary differs fromTWEET_RESULTS_BY_REST_IDS_FEATURESin several ways:
- Missing features:
tweetypie_unmention_optimization_enabledcreator_subscriptions_tweet_preview_api_enabled- New features:
responsive_web_jetfuel_frameresponsive_web_grok_image_annotation_enabled- Different values:
profile_label_improvements_pcf_label_in_post_enabledis set toTrue(vsFalse)Please verify that:
- The missing features won't impact tweet creation functionality
- The new features are required for the updated endpoint
- The different flag values are intentional
Summary by Sourcery
Chores:
Summary by CodeRabbit