Update criteria.js #2
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple JavaScript files, primarily focusing on asynchronous function implementations, control flow alterations, and method signature updates. In Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
criteria.js (1)
Line range hint
30-107: Avoid assignment withinmodule.exportsfor better clarity.Assigning
module.exportswithin an expression can be confusing and may lead to unintended side effects. It's advisable to separate the assignments for clarity.Consider refactoring as follows:
-var self = module.exports = { +module.exports = { // existing properties }If
selfis used elsewhere in the code, you can assign it separately:+var self = module.exports;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 100-100: Expected an expression but instead found ')'.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 30-107: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
criteria.js(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
criteria.js
[error] 33-33: expected ( but instead found {
Remove {
(parse)
[error] 100-100: Expected an expression but instead found ')'.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 30-107: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
| @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ const setCriteriaName = async (page, criteriaName) => { | |||
| const xpathSelect = `//pm-rule-editor/pm-match-list//pm-match[last()]//akam-select` | |||
| await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathSelect).setEnsureElementIsInTheViewport(false).click(); | |||
|
|
|||
| await akamaiMenu.clickToItemInDropdown(page, criteriaName) | |||
| await akamaiMenu.clickToItemInDropdow(page, criteriaName) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typo in the method name clickToItemInDropdow.
There is a typo in the method name clickToItemInDropdow. It should be clickToItemInDropdown.
Apply this diff to correct the method name:
- await akamaiMenu.clickToItemInDropdow(page, criteriaName)
+ await akamaiMenu.clickToItemInDropdown(page, criteriaName)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await akamaiMenu.clickToItemInDropdow(page, criteriaName) | |
| await akamaiMenu.clickToItemInDropdown(page, criteriaName) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Generate unit testing code for this file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@danghung1202, here are the unit tests for criteria.js using Jest and Puppeteer:
// criteria.test.js
const puppeteer = require('puppeteer');
const criteria = require('./criteria');
const akamaiMenu = require('./menu');
const log = require('./log');
jest.setTimeout(30000); // Increase timeout if necessary
describe('Criteria Module', () => {
let browser;
let page;
beforeAll(async () => {
browser = await puppeteer.launch({
headless: true, // Set to false if you want to see the browser
});
page = await browser.newPage();
// Navigate to the URL where the criteria is managed
await page.goto('https://your-akamai-url.com');
});
afterAll(async () => {
await browser.close();
});
test('checkHasExistedCriteria should return false when criteria does not exist', async () => {
const result = await criteria.checkHasExistedCriteria(page, 'NonExistentCriteria', 'Condition');
expect(result).toBe(false);
});
test('addNewCriteria should add a new criteria', async () => {
await criteria.addNewCriteria(page, 'Path', 'Equals', '/test/path');
const values = await criteria.getCriteriaValueByName(page, 'Path', 'Equals');
expect(values).toContain('/test/path');
});
test('getCriteriaValueByName should retrieve existing criteria values', async () => {
const values = await criteria.getCriteriaValueByName(page, 'Path', 'Equals');
expect(values).toBeDefined();
expect(values.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
test('deleteAllValueInExitedCriteria should remove all values from a criteria', async () => {
await criteria.addNewCriteria(page, 'Hostname', 'Equals', 'example.com');
await criteria.deleteAllValueInExitedCriteria(page, 'Hostname');
const values = await criteria.getCriteriaValueByName(page, 'Hostname', 'Equals');
expect(values).toEqual([]);
});
test('addValueToExistedCriteria should add value to existing criteria', async () => {
await criteria.addNewCriteria(page, 'Path', 'Equals', '/initial/path');
await criteria.addValueToExistedCriteria(page, 'Path', '/additional/path');
const values = await criteria.getCriteriaValueByName(page, 'Path', 'Equals');
expect(values).toContain('/initial/path');
expect(values).toContain('/additional/path');
});
});Make sure to adjust the page.goto('https://your-akamai-url.com'); line to navigate to the appropriate URL for your testing environment. Also, ensure that any required authentication or setup steps are handled before running the tests.
This test suite uses Jest for structuring the tests and Puppeteer for interacting with the browser. It covers the primary functions exported by criteria.js and checks their expected behaviors.
| @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ var self = module.exports = { | |||
| .click(); | |||
|
|
|||
| await setCriteriaName(page, criteriaName) | |||
| await setCriteriaCondition(page, criteriaCondition) | |||
| setCriteriaCondition(page, criteriaCondition) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Await the asynchronous setCriteriaCondition function.
The function setCriteriaCondition is asynchronous. Not awaiting it may lead to unexpected behavior due to the asynchronous execution flow.
Apply this diff to ensure proper execution:
- setCriteriaCondition(page, criteriaCondition)
+ await setCriteriaCondition(page, criteriaCondition)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| setCriteriaCondition(page, criteriaCondition) | |
| await setCriteriaCondition(page, criteriaCondition) |
| @@ -97,11 +97,11 @@ var self = module.exports = { | |||
| */ | |||
| addValueToExistedCriteria: async (page, criteriaName, newCriteriaValue, index = 1) => { | |||
| const xpathInput = `//pm-rule-editor/pm-match-list//pm-match//akam-select[contains(string(), "${criteriaName}")]/following-sibling::form//input[@akamfocusablehtmlelement]` | |||
| await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathInput) | |||
| page.locator('xpath=' + ) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Syntax error: Incomplete expression in page.locator call.
The page.locator call is missing the XPath expression, leading to a syntax error.
Apply this diff to complete the expression:
- page.locator('xpath=' + )
+ page.locator('xpath=' + xpathInput)Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 100-100: Expected an expression but instead found ')'.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
| @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ const setCriteriaValue = async (page, criteriaValue) => { | |||
| var self = module.exports = { | |||
|
|
|||
| checkHasExistedCriteria: async (page, criteriaName, criteriaCondition, criteriaVariableName = "") => { | |||
| if (criteriaName == "Variable") { | |||
| if { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Syntax error: Missing condition in if statement.
The if statement is missing a condition. You need to include a condition within parentheses.
Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:
- if {
+ if (criteriaName === "Variable") {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 33-33: expected ( but instead found {
Remove {
(parse)
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
behavior.js (1)
Line range hint
5-66: Modernize the exports patternThe current pattern of using
var self = module.exportsis outdated and can lead to confusion. Consider using modern export patterns.Apply this refactoring:
-var self = module.exports = { +const behaviorActions = { checkHasBehaviorByName: async (page, behaviorNewName) => { // ... existing methods ... } // ... other methods ... } + +module.exports = behaviorActions;rule.js (2)
191-191: Improve module exports pattern.The current pattern of using
var self = module.exports = {...}can be confusing and is flagged by static analysis. Consider using a clearer export pattern.Apply this refactor:
-var self = module.exports = { +const methods = { // ... all methods ... } + +module.exports = methods;Then update all internal references from
selftomethods.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-191: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Line range hint
1-191: Consider architectural improvements for maintainability.Several architectural improvements could enhance the maintainability of this automation code:
- Consider centralizing XPath selectors in a separate configuration file to make updates easier
- Implement more robust error handling with specific error types
- Add structured logging with correlation IDs for better debugging
- Consider implementing retry mechanisms for flaky UI interactions
Would you like help implementing any of these improvements?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
behavior.js(3 hunks)rule.js(4 hunks)tasks/active-staging/index.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
behavior.js
[error] 5-66: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
rule.js
[error] 6-191: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rule.js (1)
57-57: Verify the viewport visibility change impact.
The change from false to true for setEnsureElementIsInTheViewport might affect how elements are interacted with. Please verify that this change:
- Doesn't cause any scrolling-related issues
- Doesn't affect the reliability of element clicks
- Was intentionally made to fix a specific issue
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
The viewport visibility change appears to be an intentional improvement for rule selection
The change from false to true for setEnsureElementIsInTheViewport is specifically made only for the rule selection click action, while all other interactions (menu items, criteria, behaviors) consistently use false. This suggests an intentional change to improve reliability when clicking on rules, likely to ensure the rule element is fully visible before interaction.
- The change only affects rule selection in
rule.jsline 57 - All other interactions maintain
false, including:- Rule menu actions
- Behavior field selections
- Criteria interactions
- Menu item clicks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of setEnsureElementIsInTheViewport to ensure consistency
rg "setEnsureElementIsInTheViewport" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 3348
| @@ -24,13 +23,13 @@ const log = require('../../log'); | |||
| for (let i = 0; i < data.length; i++) { | |||
| try { | |||
|
|
|||
| await akamai.Property.goToPropertyPageByDomain(page, data[i].domain); | |||
| await akamai.Property.goToPropertyPageByDomain(page, data[i+1].domain); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix critical off-by-one error in array access
The changes from data[i] to data[i+1] introduce a critical off-by-one error that will:
- Skip the first element in the array (when i=0)
- Attempt to access an index beyond array bounds in the last iteration
- Cause inconsistency with error handling which still uses
data[i]
Apply this fix:
- await akamai.Property.goToPropertyPageByDomain(page, data[i+1].domain);
- await akamai.Property.goToPropertyByVersionNumber(page, data[i+1].version.replace("v", 'Version '))
- log.green(`Active successfully: ${data[i+1].domain}: ${data[i+1].version}`)
+ await akamai.Property.goToPropertyPageByDomain(page, data[i].domain);
+ await akamai.Property.goToPropertyByVersionNumber(page, data[i].version.replace("v", 'Version '))
+ log.green(`Active successfully: ${data[i].domain}: ${data[i].version}`)Also applies to: 28-28, 32-32
| })() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prevent browser resource leak
Commenting out browser.close() will prevent proper cleanup of browser resources. This could lead to memory leaks, especially if the script is run repeatedly.
Apply this fix:
- //await browser.close()
+ await browser.close()Consider wrapping the entire script in a try-finally block to ensure browser cleanup even if errors occur:
try {
// existing script code
} finally {
await browser.close();
}| @@ -63,6 +61,6 @@ var self = module.exports = { | |||
| await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathRadioBtn) | |||
| .on(puppeteer.LocatorEvent.Action, () => { | |||
| log.white(`Update the radio field in ${behaviorName}[${index}] -> ${fieldLabel}: ${fieldValue}`) | |||
| }).click(); | |||
| }); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing click action for radio button
The click action is missing after the event handler, which means the radio button won't actually be selected.
Apply this fix:
.on(puppeteer.LocatorEvent.Action, () => {
log.white(`Update the radio field in ${behaviorName}[${index}] -> ${fieldLabel}: ${fieldValue}`)
- });
+ })
+ .click();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| }); | |
| }) | |
| .click(); |
| const insertNewBtn = `//div[@akammodalactions]/button[contains(text(), "Insert Behavior")]` | ||
| await page.locator('xpath=' + insertBtn) | ||
| .on(puppeteer.LocatorEvent.Action, () => { | ||
| log.white(`Click to 'Insert Behavior' to save new behavior`) | ||
| }).click(); | ||
| .click(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix variable name mismatch in locator
The variable was renamed to insertNewBtn but the locator still uses the old variable name insertBtn, which will cause a ReferenceError.
Apply this fix:
const insertNewBtn = `//div[@akammodalactions]/button[contains(text(), "Insert Behavior")]`
- await page.locator('xpath=' + insertBtn)
+ await page.locator('xpath=' + insertNewBtn)
.click();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const insertNewBtn = `//div[@akammodalactions]/button[contains(text(), "Insert Behavior")]` | |
| await page.locator('xpath=' + insertBtn) | |
| .on(puppeteer.LocatorEvent.Action, () => { | |
| log.white(`Click to 'Insert Behavior' to save new behavior`) | |
| }).click(); | |
| .click(); | |
| const insertNewBtn = `//div[@akammodalactions]/button[contains(text(), "Insert Behavior")]` | |
| await page.locator('xpath=' + insertNewBtn) | |
| .click(); |
| checkHasBehaviorByName: async (page, behaviorNewName) => { | ||
| const xpathHeader = `//pm-behavior-list//pm-behavior[div[@class="header" and contains(string(), "${behaviorName}")]]` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix parameter name mismatch in XPath string
The parameter was renamed to behaviorNewName but the XPath string still references the old variable name behaviorName, which will cause a ReferenceError.
Apply this fix:
- checkHasBehaviorByName: async (page, behaviorNewName) => {
- const xpathHeader = `//pm-behavior-list//pm-behavior[div[@class="header" and contains(string(), "${behaviorName}")]]`
+ checkHasBehaviorByName: async (page, behaviorNewName) => {
+ const xpathHeader = `//pm-behavior-list//pm-behavior[div[@class="header" and contains(string(), "${behaviorNewName}")]]`📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| checkHasBehaviorByName: async (page, behaviorNewName) => { | |
| const xpathHeader = `//pm-behavior-list//pm-behavior[div[@class="header" and contains(string(), "${behaviorName}")]]` | |
| checkHasBehaviorByName: async (page, behaviorNewName) => { | |
| const xpathHeader = `//pm-behavior-list//pm-behavior[div[@class="header" and contains(string(), "${behaviorNewName}")]]` |
|
|
||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| getValueOfInputFieldInBehavior: async (page, behaviorName, fieldLabel, index = 1) => { | ||
| const xpathInput = `//pm-rule-editor/pm-behavior-list//pm-behavior[div[@class="header" and contains(string(), "${behaviorName}")]][${index}]//div[akam-form-label[contains(string(), "${fieldLabel}")]]/following-sibling::div` | ||
| await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathInput).wait() | ||
| return await page.$eval('xpath=' + xpathInput, el => el.innerText) | ||
| return await page.eval('xpath=' + xpathInput, el => el.innerText) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
API usage page.eval() appears incorrect and needs attention
The code uses page.eval() which is not a standard Puppeteer method. Based on Puppeteer v22.12.1 documentation and codebase analysis:
- No other evaluation patterns (
$eval,$$eval,evaluate) are found in use - No custom Page extensions or method overrides are present
page.eval()is not part of Puppeteer's public API
The code should use one of these standard methods instead:
page.$eval()for single element (recommended for this case)page.$$eval()for multiple elementspage.evaluate()for arbitrary JavaScript
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Puppeteer API usage
The change from page.$eval to page.eval needs verification as page.eval is not a standard Puppeteer method. The standard methods are:
page.$eval- for evaluating on a single elementpage.$$eval- for evaluating on multiple elementspage.evaluate- for evaluating arbitrary JavaScript
Let's check the Puppeteer version and available methods:
The previous results show Puppeteer v22.12.1 is being used, and there's only one instance of page.eval(). Let's verify other evaluation patterns and any custom page extensions to understand if this is a custom implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for Puppeteer version
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies.puppeteer'
# Search for similar eval usage patterns in the codebase
rg "page\.eval\(" --type js
Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other evaluation methods being used in the codebase
rg "page\.\$eval|page\.\$\$eval|page\.evaluate" --type js -A 2
# Also check for any custom page extensions or wrappers
rg "class.*extends.*Page|prototype.*eval" --type js
Length of output: 115
| @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ var self = module.exports = { | |||
|
|
|||
| clickToSelectTheDefaultRule: async (page) => { | |||
| const xpathDefaultRule = `//pm-configuration-settings//pm-rule-node[@depth=0 and contains(string(),"${DEFAULT_RULE}")]`; | |||
| await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathDefaultRule).wait() | |||
| await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathDefault) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix undefined variable and remove redundant locator call.
There are two issues here:
xpathDefaultis undefined - it should bexpathDefaultRule- The subsequent line is redundant as it's trying to locate the same element
Apply this fix:
- await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathDefault)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await page.locator('xpath=' + xpathDefault) |
| @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ var self = module.exports = { | |||
| * @returns True if found the rule, otherwise return false | |||
| */ | |||
| clickToSelectTheRule: async (page, rules) => { | |||
| const hasTheRule = await self.checkIfHasTheRule(page, rules); | |||
| const hasTheRule = await self.checkIfHasTheRule(page); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix missing required parameter in function call.
The checkIfHasTheRule function requires two parameters (page, rules), but it's being called with only (page). This will cause the function to fail as it uses the rules parameter in its implementation.
Apply this fix:
- const hasTheRule = await self.checkIfHasTheRule(page);
+ const hasTheRule = await self.checkIfHasTheRule(page, rules);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Improvements