Lgtm: part6

[HashEngineering]

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

• I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (0ce9035) 48.00% compared to head (1b2b349) 45.10%.

❗ Current head 1b2b349 differs from pull request most recent head eb20624. Consider uploading reports for the commit eb20624 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
...n/java/org/bitcoinj/governance/GovernanceVote.java	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #161      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     48.00%   45.10%   -2.90%     
+ Complexity     6666     5327    -1339     
============================================
  Files           409      379      -30     
  Lines         46110    41452    -4658     
  Branches       6502     5658     -844     
============================================
- Hits          22136    18698    -3438     
+ Misses        21570    20800     -770     
+ Partials       2404     1954     -450     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ankit-gautam23]

LGTM