feat: advance remote state on push #189
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/ogre/src/repository.ts (2)
110-114: Enhance documentation for thepushmethod.The documentation comment could be more descriptive to help users understand:
- What constitutes a successful push
- Error handling expectations
- Example usage
Consider expanding the documentation:
/** * Runs an arbitrary backend push command and after success advances the locally stored remote state + * + * @param pushToBackendFn - Function that performs the actual push to the backend + * @returns Promise that resolves to true if push was successful and remote state was updated + * @throws Any errors from the backend push operation should be handled by the caller + * + * @example + * ```ts + * await repo.push(async () => { + * try { + * await backendClient.push(repo.getHistory()) + * return true + * } catch (err) { + * console.error('Push failed:', err) + * return false + * } + * }) + * ``` */
162-169: Consider implementing git-like remote refs structure.The FIXME comment suggests moving this to
refs/remotelike git. This would be a good architectural improvement as it:
- Aligns with git's proven model
- Provides clearer separation of local and remote state
- Makes future remote-related features easier to implement
Consider creating a follow-up ticket to implement this improvement. The refactoring would involve:
- Creating a
refs/remotenamespace- Moving remote refs under this namespace
- Updating related methods to handle the new structure
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/ogre/src/repository.ts(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/ogre/src/repository.ts (2)
127-127: LGTM! Good refactoring.
Moving the remote state initialization to a dedicated method improves code organization and reusability.
204-209: LGTM! Good balance of mutability and safety.
The properties allow updates while maintaining internal immutability through ReadonlyMap and ReadonlyArray.
| async push(pushToBackendFn: () => Promise<boolean>): Promise<boolean> { | ||
| const success = await pushToBackendFn() | ||
| if (success) { | ||
| this.storeRemoteState(this.getHistory()) | ||
| } | ||
| return success | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and type safety.
The push implementation could be enhanced with better error handling and type safety.
Consider these improvements:
- async push(pushToBackendFn: () => Promise<boolean>): Promise<boolean> {
- const success = await pushToBackendFn()
- if (success) {
- this.storeRemoteState(this.getHistory())
- }
- return success
+ async push(pushToBackendFn: () => Promise<boolean>): Promise<boolean> {
+ try {
+ const success: boolean = await pushToBackendFn()
+ if (success) {
+ this.storeRemoteState(this.getHistory())
+ }
+ return success
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Preserve the original error stack
+ throw error instanceof Error
+ ? error
+ : new Error('Push to backend failed: ' + String(error))
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async push(pushToBackendFn: () => Promise<boolean>): Promise<boolean> { | |
| const success = await pushToBackendFn() | |
| if (success) { | |
| this.storeRemoteState(this.getHistory()) | |
| } | |
| return success | |
| } | |
| async push(pushToBackendFn: () => Promise<boolean>): Promise<boolean> { | |
| try { | |
| const success: boolean = await pushToBackendFn() | |
| if (success) { | |
| this.storeRemoteState(this.getHistory()) | |
| } | |
| return success | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| // Preserve the original error stack | |
| throw error instanceof Error | |
| ? error | |
| : new Error('Push to backend failed: ' + String(error)) | |
| } | |
| } |
|
🚀 PR was released in |
📦 Published PR as canary version:
Canary Versions✨ Test out this PR locally via:
Summary by CodeRabbit
pushmethod for the repository, enabling updates to be sent to the backend.