源代码封版推送 #368
源代码封版推送 #368
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes extensive modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/Compile/Access/AccessModelTest.cs (1)
5-5: Good improvement! Consider extending readonly to other fields.Making
PrivateNamereadonly is a good practice as it ensures immutability. For consistency, consider applying the same pattern toInternalNameandPublicNamesince they appear to be constant values used for testing.Here's how you could make all fields consistent:
- private readonly string PrivateName = "Private"; - internal string InternalName = "Internal"; - public string PublicName = "Public"; + private readonly string PrivateName = "Private"; + internal readonly string InternalName = "Internal"; + public readonly string PublicName = "Public";src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.csproj (1)
Inconsistent Compiler Settings Detected
The removal of
LangVersionandNullableproperties insrc/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.csprojis not uniformly managed across the repository. Project files with explicitly setLangVersionorNullable:
- samples/ReferenceSample/ReferenceSample.csproj
- samples/AllProxySample/AllProxySample.csproj
- samples/DebugSample/DebugSample.csproj
- samples/ExtensionSample/ExtensionSample.csproj
- samples/HE/NET6.0/WebapiSample/WebapiSample.csproj
- samples/HESample/HESample.csproj
- samples/WinFormsSample/WinFormsSample.csproj
- samples/HE/NET6.0/WebapiWIthController/WebapiWIthController.csproj
- samples/HE/NET5.0/WinFormsSample/WinFormsSample.csproj
- samples/WPFSample/WPFSample.csproj
- test/benchmark/NormalBenchmark/NormalBenchmark.csproj
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Component/Core/Natasha.Domain/Natasha.Domain.csproj
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.csproj
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Component/Core/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.Domain/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.Domain.csproj
- test/benchmark/NatashaBenchmark/NatashaBenchmark.csproj
- test/benchmark/BenchmarkProject/BenchmarkProject.csproj
- test/ut/Plugin/Domain/Domain.csproj
- samples/PluginSample/PluginA/PluginA.csproj
- samples/PluginSample/PluginB/PluginB.csproj
- samples/PluginSample/PluginBase/PluginBase.csproj
- samples/PluginSample/PluginSample/PluginSample.csproj
- test/ut/Plugin/Compile/Compile.csproj
- samples/HotReloadSample/HotReloadSample.csproj
- samples/HotReloadPlugin/HotReloadPlugin.csproj
- test/ut/Natasha.CSharp.UnitTest.Base/Natasha.CSharp.UnitTest.Base.csproj
- test/workflow/Workflow.Initialization/Workflow.Initialization.csproj
- test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/MemAssembly.csproj
- test/workflow/Workflow.Nuget.Publish/Workflow.Nuget.Publish.csproj
- test/ut/Extension/Template/NatashaUT.csproj
- test/workflow/Solution.NET.Sdk/Solution.NET.Sdk.csproj
- test/workflow/Workflow.Runner/Workflow.Runner.csproj
- test/workflow/Github.NET.Sdk/Github.NET.Sdk.csproj
- test/workflow/Github.NMSAction.NET.Sdk/Github.NMSAction.NET.Sdk.csproj
- test/ut/Extension/Extension/NatashaFunctionUT.csproj
- test/ut/Compile/RefAssembly/RefAssembly.csproj
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-31: Review removed compiler settingsThe removal of
LangVersionandNullableproperties might affect the project's behavior. Consider:
- If these settings are now managed centrally (e.g., Directory.Build.props), ensure consistent application across all projects
- If not, consider documenting the expected C# language version and nullable reference behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for centralized build properties # Look for Directory.Build.props or similar files echo "Checking for centralized build properties:" fd "Directory.Build.props" fd "*.props" | grep -v "Directory.Build.props" # Check other project files for similar settings echo "Checking other projects for language version and nullable settings:" rg -l "LangVersion|Nullable" --type csprojLength of output: 759
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for centralized build properties # Look for Directory.Build.props or similar files echo "Checking for centralized build properties:" fd --glob 'Directory.Build.props' fd --glob '*.props' | grep -v 'Directory.Build.props' # Check other project files for language version and nullable settings echo "Checking other projects for language version and nullable settings:" rg -l "LangVersion|Nullable" --glob "*.csproj"Length of output: 2355
src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/ReCompile/Component/SyntaxHandler/ToplevelHandler.cs (4)
14-18: Enhance XML documentation completenessThe XML documentation is incomplete and mixed language (Chinese/English). Consider:
- Adding parameter description for
root- Adding return value description
- Using consistent language (preferably English for international collaboration)
Here's a suggested improvement:
/// <summary> -/// 包裹顶级语句 +/// Wraps top-level statements into a Program class with an async Main method. /// </summary> -/// <param name="root"></param> -/// <returns></returns> +/// <param name="root">The compilation unit containing potential top-level statements</param> +/// <returns>A transformed compilation unit with top-level statements wrapped in a Program class, or the original if no transformation needed</returns>
Line range hint
20-35: Consider adding validation and error handlingThe method makes several assumptions about the input that could lead to runtime errors:
- No null check for
root- No validation for
root.Membersbeing non-empty- Assumes successful parsing of the constructed content
Consider adding proper validation:
public static CompilationUnitSyntax Handle(CompilationUnitSyntax root) { + if (root == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(root)); + if (root.Members.Count == 0) return root; + var file = root.SyntaxTree.FilePath; var firstMember = root.Members[0]; if (firstMember != null && firstMember.IsKind(SyntaxKind.GlobalStatement)) { #if DEBUG HEProxy.ShowMessage("检测到顶级语句！"); #endif var usings = root.Usings; root = root.RemoveNodes(usings, SyntaxRemoveOptions.KeepExteriorTrivia)!; var content = "public class Program{ async static Task Main(string[] args){" + root!.ToFullString() + "}}"; + try { var tree = NatashaCSharpSyntax.ParseTree(content, file,(CSharpParseOptions)(root.SyntaxTree).Options); root = tree.GetCompilationUnitRoot(); root = root.AddUsings([.. usings]); + } catch (Exception ex) { + throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to transform top-level statements", ex); + } } return root; }
Line range hint
27-27: Localize debug messagesThe debug message is in Chinese. Consider using English for consistency or implementing proper localization.
-HEProxy.ShowMessage("检测到顶级语句！"); +HEProxy.ShowMessage("Top-level statements detected!");
Line range hint
31-31: Consider making the Program class name configurableThe hardcoded "Program" class name might conflict with existing types. Consider making it configurable or generating a unique name.
Consider adding a parameter for the class name or generating a unique name:
+private static string GetUniqueClassName() => $"Program_{Guid.NewGuid():N}"; + public static CompilationUnitSyntax Handle(CompilationUnitSyntax root) { // ... - var content = "public class Program{ async static Task Main(string[] args){" + root!.ToFullString() + "}}"; + var className = GetUniqueClassName(); + var content = $"public class {className}{{ async static Task Main(string[] args){{{root!.ToFullString()}}}}}"; // ... }src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG.csproj (1)
9-11: Consider adding English translationsThe description and release notes are currently in Chinese only. Consider adding English translations to improve accessibility for international users:
-<Description>动态重载控制台代码结果.</Description> -<PackageReleaseNotes>升级到最新版.</PackageReleaseNotes> +<Description>动态重载控制台代码结果. (Dynamic reload console code results.)</Description> +<PackageReleaseNotes>升级到最新版. (Upgraded to latest version.)</PackageReleaseNotes>samples/Directory.Build.props (1)
1-27: Add XML documentation for build properties and conditionsThe build configuration is well-structured, but would benefit from documentation explaining:
- The purpose of each suppressed warning
- The significance of the HE and NETCORE3.0 conditions
- The role of the source generator in the build process
Add XML comments above each major section, for example:
<Project> + <!-- + Warning suppressions: + - CS8602: Suppressed due to [reason] + - CS8032: Suppressed due to [reason] + ... + --> <PropertyGroup>test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/MemAssembly.csproj (2)
Line range hint
19-24: Consider updating xunit.runner.visualstudio packageThe xunit.runner.visualstudio package (2.4.5) is not aligned with the xunit package version (2.5.3). Consider updating to maintain consistency and avoid potential compatibility issues.
<PackageReference Include="coverlet.collector" Version="6.0.2" /> <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk" Version="17.9.0" /> <PackageReference Include="xunit" Version="2.5.3" /> -<PackageReference Include="xunit.runner.visualstudio" Version="2.4.5" /> +<PackageReference Include="xunit.runner.visualstudio" Version="2.5.3" />
Removal of
IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute.csaffects multiple files. Please address or remove dependent references to avoid potential issues.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
15-17: Verify removal of IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute.csThe removal of this file might affect assembly access checks. Please ensure:
- The functionality is either moved elsewhere or no longer needed
- No breaking changes for existing tests that might depend on this attribute
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute echo "Checking for references to IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute..." rg -l "IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute" # Check if the attribute is defined elsewhere ast-grep --pattern 'class IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute'Length of output: 92783
samples/DebugSample/Program.cs (1)
26-29: Add assertions to verify delegate execution resultsThe delegate execution with floating-point values could lead to precision issues. Consider adding assertions to verify the expected behavior.
var action = builder .GetAssembly() .GetDelegateFromShortName<Func<int, short, double, long>>("A", "Show"); -var a = action(1,2,1.2); +var result = action(1, 2, 1.2); +Debug.Assert(result == 14, $"Expected 14 but got {result}"); // 1 + 2 + 1.2 + 10 ≈ 14src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Extension/NatashaStringExtension.cs (2)
9-14: Consider enhancing the XML documentationThe documentation could be improved in several ways:
- Consider providing English translations alongside Chinese text for better international collaboration
- Add
<returns>documentation to describe the return value- Expand the
objectsparameter description to clearly specify the expected format and examples for each accepted type (private member instance, namespace string, private type)/// <summary> /// 给当前类脚本增加私有注解 + /// Add private access annotations to the current class script /// </summary> /// <param name="script"></param> /// <param name="objects">可以是私有成员实例/命名空间字符串"interal.aa"/私有类型</param> + /// <param name="objects">Can be: + /// - Private member instances + /// - Namespace strings (e.g., "internal.aa") + /// - Private types</param> + /// <returns>A CompilationUnitSyntax with private access annotations applied</returns>
Line range hint
43-46: Fix infinite recursion in method implementationThe current implementation creates an infinite recursion by calling itself instead of the other overload. This will cause a StackOverflowException at runtime.
public static string WithAllUsingCode(this string script, params string[] exceptUsings) { - return WithAllUsingCode(script, exceptUsings); + return WithAllUsingCode(script, (IEnumerable<string>)exceptUsings); }src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Component/Metadata/NatashaLoadContext.cs (1)
49-61: Design approach looks good.The new constructor provides a flexible way to inject existing domain contexts while maintaining consistency with the class's responsibilities. It aligns well with dependency injection principles and could be particularly useful for testing scenarios.
Consider documenting the intended use cases for this constructor, particularly how it differs from the Creator pattern used by other constructors.
src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator/NatashaSlimMethodBuilder.cs (1)
7-9: Consider documenting default Builder configuration.The inline initialization of
Builderwithnew()uses default configuration. Consider documenting the default behavior or adding a method to reset to default configuration if needed.The collection expression syntax (
[]) forUsingsinitialization requires C# 12.Consider adding XML documentation:
+ /// <summary> + /// The assembly builder with default configuration. + /// </summary> public readonly AssemblyCSharpBuilder Builder = new(); + /// <summary> + /// The script to be compiled. + /// </summary> public readonly string Script = script; + /// <summary> + /// Collection of using directives to be included. + /// </summary> public readonly HashSet<string> Usings = [];src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/CompileUnit/AssemblyCSharpBuilder.Compile.cs (1)
33-33: Consider adding runtime validation for assembly nameThe documentation change emphasizes the importance of specifying a new assembly name. Consider adding runtime validation to ensure the assembly name is always specified.
public AssemblyCSharpBuilder Reset() { WithPreCompilationOptions(); WithPreCompilationReferences(); + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(AssemblyName)) + { + throw new InvalidOperationException("Assembly name must be specified after Reset()"); + } return this; }src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs (3)
Line range hint
205-270: Consider breaking down the HandleTree method for better maintainabilityThe method handles multiple responsibilities including:
- File parsing
- Syntax tree manipulation
- CS0104 handling
- Debug output
Consider splitting this into smaller, focused methods following the Single Responsibility Principle.
Suggested refactor structure:
private async static Task<SyntaxTree?> HandleTree(string file) { var tree = await ParseSourceFile(file); if (tree == null || !HasMembers(tree)) return tree; var processedRoot = await ProcessSyntaxRoot(tree.GetCompilationUnitRoot()); return CreateFinalTree(processedRoot, file); } private static async Task<SyntaxTree?> ParseSourceFile(string file) { ... } private static bool HasMembers(SyntaxTree tree) { ... } private static async Task<CompilationUnitSyntax> ProcessSyntaxRoot(CompilationUnitSyntax root) { ... } private static SyntaxTree CreateFinalTree(CompilationUnitSyntax root, string file) { ... }
Line range hint
273-419: Improve error handling and method organization in HotExecuteThe method is quite long and handles multiple concerns. Consider:
- Extracting the cleanup logic into a separate method
- Using a more structured approach for error handling
- Adding logging for better diagnostics
Suggested improvements:
private static async Task HotExecute() { + await using var _ = new AsyncScope(CleanupResources); try { - CleanErrorFiles(); + await CleanupAndInitialize(); + await UpdateCompilationOptions(); + await CompileAndExecute(); } catch (NatashaException nex) { + await HandleNatashaException(nex); } catch (Exception ex) { + await HandleGeneralException(ex); } finally { _isHotCompiling = false; } } + private static async Task CleanupAndInitialize() { ... } + private static async Task UpdateCompilationOptions() { ... } + private static async Task CompileAndExecute() { ... }
Line range hint
421-432: Improve file cleanup logicThe current implementation using string operations could be enhanced using pattern matching and LINQ for better readability and maintainability.
private static void CleanErrorFiles() { - var files = Directory.GetFiles(VSCSProjectInfoHelper.HEOutputPath); - foreach (var file in files) - { - if (Path.GetFileName(file).StartsWith("error.")) - { - File.Delete(file); - } - } + Directory.EnumerateFiles(VSCSProjectInfoHelper.HEOutputPath, "error.*") + .ToList() + .ForEach(File.Delete); }Natasha.sln (1)
Removed projects are still referenced in the solution and project files.
WinFormsSampleis referenced inNatasha.sln.WPFSampleis present in multiple files within thesamples/directory.ReferenceSampleandHotReloadSamplestill have project references and related code.Ensure all references to these projects are deleted to fully clean up the solution.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-590: Verify removed projects are fully cleaned up.According to the AI summary, several projects were removed (ReferenceSample, HotReloadSample, HotReloadPlugin, WinFormsSample, WPFSample). Ensure that:
- All references to these projects are removed from the solution
- No orphaned project dependencies remain
- Build configurations are properly cleaned up
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remnants of removed projects # Test: Search for any remaining references to removed projects rg -i "ReferenceSample|HotReloadSample|HotReloadPlugin|WinFormsSample|WPFSample" # Test: Check for any orphaned GUIDs from removed projects in other project files fd -e csproj | xargs grep -l "ProjectReference"Length of output: 7138
samples/HE/NETCORE3.0/ConsoleSample/Program.cs (2)
99-102: Potential Missing Argument: '参数4'In the method
ProxyMainArguments(), you append arguments "参数1" through "参数3" and then "参数5". It appears that "参数4" is missing. Please verify if "参数4" should be included for sequence consistency.Apply this diff to include "参数4":
HEProxy.AppendArgs("参数3"); + HEProxy.AppendArgs("参数4"); HEProxy.AppendArgs("参数5");
14-95: Consider Using Consistent Language in CommentsThe code contains comments in both Chinese and English. For consistency and maintainability, consider using a single language for comments throughout the file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
Natasha.sln(5 hunks)samples/AllProxySample/Program.cs(1 hunks)samples/DebugSample/DebugSample.csproj(1 hunks)samples/DebugSample/Program.cs(1 hunks)samples/Directory.Build.props(1 hunks)samples/ExtensionSample/Program.cs(1 hunks)samples/HE/NET5.0/ConsoleSample/Program.cs(0 hunks)samples/HE/NET6.0/WebapiWIthController/Program.cs(0 hunks)samples/HE/NETCORE3.0/ConsoleSample/ConsoleSample.csproj(1 hunks)samples/HE/NETCORE3.0/ConsoleSample/HEOutput/Debug.txt(1 hunks)samples/HE/NETCORE3.0/ConsoleSample/Program.cs(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Component/Core/Natasha.Domain/Natasha.Domain.csproj(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG.csproj(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.csproj(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/ReCompile/Component/SyntaxHandler/ToplevelHandler.cs(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/README.md(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.Codecov/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.Codecov.csproj(0 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator.csproj(0 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator/NatashaSlimMethodBuilder.cs(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/CompileUnit/AssemblyCSharpBuilder.Compile.cs(4 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Component/Compiler/Model/CompilerBinderFlags.cs(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Component/Metadata/NatashaLoadContext.cs(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Extension/NatashaAssemblyBuilderExtension.cs(2 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Extension/NatashaStringExtension.cs(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.csproj(1 hunks)src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Utils/NatashaAccessHelper.cs(1 hunks)test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/Compile/Access/AccessModelTest.cs(1 hunks)test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/Compile/Access/PrivateTest.cs(0 hunks)test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/MemAssembly.csproj(1 hunks)test/ut/Compile/RefAssembly/RefAssembly.csproj(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- samples/HE/NET5.0/ConsoleSample/Program.cs
- samples/HE/NET6.0/WebapiWIthController/Program.cs
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.Codecov/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.Codecov.csproj
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator.csproj
- test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/Compile/Access/PrivateTest.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- samples/DebugSample/DebugSample.csproj
- samples/ExtensionSample/Program.cs
- samples/HE/NETCORE3.0/ConsoleSample/ConsoleSample.csproj
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/README.md
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Component/Compiler/Model/CompilerBinderFlags.cs
- src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Utils/NatashaAccessHelper.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
samples/HE/NETCORE3.0/ConsoleSample/HEOutput/Debug.txt
[style] ~24-~24: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...2 参数3 参数4 In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loo...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~25-~25: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ile loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loo...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~26-~26: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ile loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! Renamed: G:...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~27-~27: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ile loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! Renamed: G:\Project\OpenSou...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~52-~52: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ile loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop!
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~53-~53: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 10 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1324 characters long)
Context: ...while loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop!
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
[style] ~53-~53: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ile loop! In while loop! In while loop! In while loop!
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
src/Natasha.CSharp/Component/Core/Natasha.Domain/Natasha.Domain.csproj (2)
Line range hint 9-11: LGTM! Version numbers are properly aligned
The Version, FileVersion, and AssemblyVersion are all aligned to 8.0.0.0, following semantic versioning best practices.
13-13: Verify implications of using preview language version
Setting LangVersion to preview enables latest C# language features that are not yet stable. This carries several risks:
- Preview features may change or be removed in future releases
- Different developers may have incompatible tooling versions
- CI/CD environments need to support preview features
Run the following script to check for preview language feature usage:
Consider adding a comment in the project file explaining why preview features are needed, and document any preview features being used.
src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.csproj (1)
11-11: LGTM! Package tags updated to better reflect the extension's nature.
The updated tags better categorize this package as a Natasha extension, which is more accurate than the previous tags.
samples/AllProxySample/Program.cs (2)
11-11: LGTM: Simplified constructor syntax
The change to use target-typed new expression is a good modernization of the code.
Line range hint 14-21: Security: Add validation for plugin loading
The current implementation loads and executes assemblies without validation, which could pose security risks. Consider implementing:
- Assembly signature verification
- Allowlist of permitted assemblies
- Error handling for assembly loading failures
- Sandbox execution environment
Additionally, document the purpose of CurrentHEExeFilePath AppContext key.
Let's check for any security measures in the codebase:
src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.csproj (1)
16-16: Verify compatibility with netstandard2.0
The major version upgrade of Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyModel from 8.0.2 to 9.0.0 requires careful verification:
- Ensure compatibility with netstandard2.0
- Review breaking changes between v8.x and v9.0
- Verify impact on dependent projects
src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG.csproj (3)
12-14: Verify semantic versioning compliance
The version has been set to 8.0.0.0. Given this appears to be a major version:
- Ensure breaking changes are documented
- Verify that this version aligns with the project's versioning strategy
#!/bin/bash
# Check for previous version and changelog
rg -l "Version|CHANGELOG|BREAKING" --type md
cat README.md 2>/dev/null || true8-8: Review necessity of unsafe code
The AllowUnsafeBlocks setting enables potentially dangerous low-level operations. Please verify if unsafe code is actually needed in this Source Generator.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for unsafe code usage
rg -l "unsafe" --type cs4-4: Verify compatibility with existing consumers
The upgrade from netstandard2.0 to netstandard2.1 is a breaking change as it drops support for .NET Framework. Ensure this aligns with the project's compatibility requirements.
samples/Directory.Build.props (2)
20-26: Verify source generator configuration and compatibility
The source generator configuration looks correct with proper analyzer settings. However, let's verify the compatibility with different target frameworks.
✅ Verification successful
Source generator configuration is correctly set up and compatible
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify source generator project and its target framework compatibility
echo "Checking source generator project..."
if [ -f "src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG.csproj" ]; then
echo "✓ Source generator project found"
# Check target framework
grep -A 3 "TargetFramework" "src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG.csproj"
else
echo "✗ Source generator project not found"
fi
# Check for Generator attribute usage
echo "Checking for Generator attribute usage..."
rg "GeneratorAttribute|ISourceGenerator" --type cs
Length of output: 29507
8-19: Verify project reference paths and dependencies
The project references look well-structured, but let's verify their existence and relationships.
✅ Verification successful
Project references are valid and no circular dependencies found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced projects and their relationships
# Check if the referenced projects exist
echo "Verifying project references..."
for project in \
"src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.csproj" \
"src/Natasha.CSharp/Component/Core/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.Domain/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler.Domain.csproj" \
"src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator.csproj"
do
if [ -f "$project" ]; then
echo "✓ Found: $project"
else
echo "✗ Missing: $project"
fi
done
# Check for circular dependencies
echo "Checking for project references in the found files..."
for project in $(fd -e csproj); do
echo "References in $project:"
grep -A 2 "ProjectReference" "$project" || echo "No project references found"
done
Length of output: 29507
test/ut/Compile/MemAssembly/MemAssembly.csproj (1)
4-4: Verify .NET 9.0 preview compatibility
Adding .NET 9.0 target framework is forward-looking but requires careful consideration:
- Ensure all dependencies support .NET 9.0 preview
- Consider documenting any preview-specific behaviors or limitations
#!/bin/bash
# Check package compatibility with .NET 9.0
echo "Checking package references for .NET 9.0 compatibility..."
rg -l --type xml "<PackageReference" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file" | grep -A 1 "<PackageReference"
donetest/ut/Compile/RefAssembly/RefAssembly.csproj (2)
Line range hint 15-17: Verify impact of removing IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute
The removal of IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute.cs might affect tests involving assembly access checks. Please ensure this doesn't break any existing tests.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests that might depend on IgnoresAccessChecksToAttribute
rg -l "IgnoresAccessChecksTo" --glob "**/*Test*.cs"
# Look for usage of the attribute in test files
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ [IgnoresAccessChecksTo$_] $$$ }'4-4: Verify .NET 9 SDK availability and package compatibility
Adding net9.0 target framework is forward-looking, but please ensure:
- The CI/CD pipeline has the .NET 9 SDK preview installed
- All package dependencies support .NET 9 or are framework-independent
src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/Natasha.CSharp.Extension.MethodCreator/NatashaSlimMethodBuilder.cs (2)
13-13: LGTM!
The empty line addition improves code organization.
5-5: Verify .NET version compatibility and update documentation for breaking change.
The switch to primary constructor syntax requires C# 12/.NET 8. This is a breaking change as it now requires the script parameter during instantiation.
src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/Extension/NatashaAssemblyBuilderExtension.cs (2)
119-125: LGTM! Parameter name change improves clarity.
The rename from domain to loadContext better aligns with the method's purpose and maintains consistency with the method name.
126-132:
Method implementation may lead to unexpected behavior.
Several concerns with the new overload:
- The method name
UseExistLoadContextsuggests using an existing context, butDomainManagement.Createmight create a new one. Consider using a more appropriate name or implementing actual context reuse. - Missing XML documentation for the new overload.
- The error message could be more descriptive about the expected format/requirements for the name.
- No validation that the created context matches the provided domain's context.
Consider this implementation instead:
+/// <summary>
+/// Uses an existing load context from the provided dynamic load context base.
+/// </summary>
+/// <param name="builder">The assembly builder instance.</param>
+/// <param name="domain">The dynamic load context to use.</param>
+/// <returns>The builder instance for method chaining.</returns>
+/// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException">Thrown when domain or domain.Name is null.</exception>
+/// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">Thrown when the context cannot be found.</exception>
public static AssemblyCSharpBuilder UseExistLoadContext(this AssemblyCSharpBuilder builder, INatashaDynamicLoadContextBase domain)
{
+ if (domain == null)
+ throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(domain));
+
if (domain.Name == null)
- throw new NullReferenceException("domain.Name 为空, 无法从缓存中找到该值！");
+ throw new ArgumentNullException($"{nameof(domain)}.{nameof(domain.Name)}",
+ "The context name cannot be null. Ensure a valid name is provided.");
- builder.LoadContext = DomainManagement.Create(domain.Name);
+ // Get existing context instead of potentially creating a new one
+ var context = DomainManagement.Get(domain.Name);
+ if (context == null)
+ throw new InvalidOperationException(
+ $"No existing context found with name '{domain.Name}'.");
+
+ builder.LoadContext = context;
return builder;
}Let's verify the usage of DomainManagement.Create vs Get:
src/Natasha.CSharp/Natasha.CSharp.Compiler/CompileUnit/AssemblyCSharpBuilder.Compile.cs (1)
2-2: LGTM: Required import for C# compilation functionality
The addition of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp import is appropriate for the C# assembly builder.
Natasha.sln (2)
233-235: Documentation addition looks good.
The addition of README.md to the HotExecutor project section improves project documentation.
264-266: Verify NETCore3.0 project configuration.
The addition of the NETCore3.0 section with ConsoleSample project looks well-structured with proper build configurations and nested project relationships. However, ensure that:
- The target framework in the project file matches the folder structure
- All necessary dependencies are properly configured
Also applies to: 486-489, 585-586
samples/HE/NETCORE3.0/ConsoleSample/Program.cs (2)
32-32: Verify the Method Name 'RegistDomainCreator'
The method name RegistDomainCreator may be a typo. Please verify if it should be RegisterDomainCreator. An incorrect method name could lead to a compilation error.
Run the following script to search for the correct method name in the codebase:
58-58: Verify the Method 'ToHotExecutor()' on 'CancellationTokenSource'
Please ensure that the method ToHotExecutor() exists for CancellationTokenSource. If this is an extension method, confirm that the appropriate using directive or namespace is included to avoid runtime errors.
Run the following script to check for the definition of ToHotExecutor() extension method on CancellationTokenSource:
| string file = "G:\\Project\\OpenSource\\Jester\\src\\backend\\Jester.Api\\bin\\Debug\\net8.0\\Jester.Api.dll"; | ||
| string dependencyDirectory = Path.GetDirectoryName(file)!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the plugin path configurable
The hardcoded path G:\\Project\\... reduces portability and makes deployment challenging. Consider:
- Moving this to configuration
- Using relative paths or environment variables
Example improvement:
- string file = "G:\\Project\\OpenSource\\Jester\\src\\backend\\Jester.Api\\bin\\Debug\\net8.0\\Jester.Api.dll";
- string dependencyDirectory = Path.GetDirectoryName(file)!;
+ string file = Configuration.GetPluginPath() ?? throw new InvalidOperationException("Plugin path not configured");
+ string dependencyDirectory = Path.GetDirectoryName(file) ??
+ throw new InvalidOperationException("Invalid plugin path");Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <PropertyGroup> | ||
| <NoWarn>CS0169;CS8602;CS8002;CS8032;1701;1702;0168;NETSDK1138;IDE0060;xUnit2000;CS0067;CS8321;CS0649;CA1822;CS1998;RS1014;CS1591;CA1050;</NoWarn> | ||
| <IsHEProject Condition="$(MSBuildProjectFullPath.Contains('$([MSBuild]::NormalizeDirectory('$(SolutionDir)', 'samples','HE'))'))">true</IsHEProject> | ||
| <IsHENETCore30 Condition="$(MSBuildProjectFullPath.Contains('$([MSBuild]::NormalizeDirectory('$(SolutionDir)', 'samples','HE','NETCORE3.0'))'))">true</IsHENETCore30> | ||
| </PropertyGroup> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Review Suppressed Warnings:
-
CS0169: Multiple unused private fields detected. Evaluate the necessity of suppressing these warnings.
-
CA1050: No issues found; types are correctly declared within namespaces.
🔗 Analysis chain
Review and document warning suppressions
The extensive list of suppressed warnings includes some that could indicate potential issues:
- CS8602: Possible null reference dereference
- CS8032: Invalid analyzer configuration
- IDE0060: Remove unused parameter
- CS0649: Field never assigned
Let's check if these warnings are actually occurring in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of the suppressed warning patterns
# to verify if they are actually needed
echo "Searching for warning patterns in the codebase..."
rg -l "CS8602|CS8032|IDE0060|CS0649" --type cs
echo "Checking for compiler warning comments..."
rg "#pragma warning|// CS\d{4}|// IDE\d{4}" --type cs
Length of output: 2238
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for potential occurrences of suppressed warnings not identified in the initial scan.
echo "Searching for CS0169 (field never used)..."
rg "private\s+\w+\s+\w+;" --type cs
echo "Searching for CS1701 and CS1702 (Assembly version conflicts)..."
rg "assembly:\s+AssemblyVersion\(" --type cs
echo "Searching for CS8321 (unused local functions)..."
rg "\blocal\s+function\b" --type cs
echo "Searching for CA1822 (mark members as static)..."
rg "\bpublic\s+.*\{\s+get;\s+set;\s+\}" --type cs
echo "Searching for RS1014 (unused private members)..."
rg "private\s+\w+\s+\w+\s*\(" --type cs
echo "Searching for CS1591 (missing XML comments)..."
rg "public\s+.*;" --type cs
echo "Searching for CA1050 (Declare types in namespaces)..."
rg "namespace\s+\w+" --type cs
Length of output: 226391
| AssemblyCSharpBuilder builder = new(); | ||
| builder.UseSmartMode(); | ||
| builder.AppendExceptUsings("System.IO"); | ||
| builder.WithDebugPlusCompile(debugger => debugger.ForStandard()); | ||
| builder.Add("public static class A{ public static void Show(){ Console.WriteLine(File.Exists(\"1\")); } }"); | ||
| builder.Add("public static class A{ public static void Show(int i,int j){ return i+j; } }"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix critical type mismatch in CS0104Test
There are several issues in this method:
- The
Showmethod is declared asvoidbut contains areturn i+jstatement - The delegate type
Actiondoesn't match the method's signature which returns a value
Apply these fixes:
-builder.Add("public static class A{ public static void Show(int i,int j){ return i+j; } }");
-var action = builder.GetAssembly().GetDelegateFromShortName<Action>("A", "Show");
+builder.Add("public static class A{ public static int Show(int i,int j){ return i+j; } }");
+var action = builder.GetAssembly().GetDelegateFromShortName<Func<int,int,int>>("A", "Show");Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| builder.Add(@"public static class A{ | ||
| public static long Show(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | ||
| public static long Show2(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | ||
| public static long Show3(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | ||
| public static long Show4(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | ||
| }"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce code duplication in class A
The dynamically generated class contains four identical methods that only differ in name. This violates the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.
Consider refactoring to a single method or using a more maintainable approach:
-public static class A{
-public static long Show(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); }
-public static long Show2(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); }
-public static long Show3(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); }
-public static long Show4(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); }
-}
+public static class A {
+ private const long ADJUSTMENT = 10;
+ public static long Calculate(int i, short j, double z) => (long)(i + j + z + ADJUSTMENT);
+}Also, consider documenting why the constant value 10 is added to the result.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| builder.Add(@"public static class A{ | |
| public static long Show(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | |
| public static long Show2(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | |
| public static long Show3(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | |
| public static long Show4(int i,short j,double z){ return (long)(i + j + z + 10); } | |
| }"); | |
| builder.Add(@"public static class A { | |
| private const long ADJUSTMENT = 10; | |
| public static long Calculate(int i, short j, double z) => (long)(i + j + z + ADJUSTMENT); | |
| }"); |
| AssemblyCSharpBuilder builder = new(); | ||
| builder.GetException(); | ||
| builder.UseRandomLoadContext(); | ||
| builder.UseSmartMode(); | ||
| builder.WithDebugPlusCompile(debugger=>debugger.ForStandard()); | ||
| builder.Add("public static class A{ public static void Show(){ Console.WriteLine(1); } }"); | ||
| var action = builder.GetAssembly().GetDelegateFromShortName<Action>("A", "Show"); | ||
| action(); | ||
| //builder.WithFileOutput(); | ||
| builder.WithDebugCompile(debugger => debugger.ForCore()); | ||
| //builder.WithDebugCompile(debugger=>debugger.ForStandard()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update all instances of deprecated API methods to the new configuration
- Remaining usages found:
samples/DebugSample/Program.cssrc/Natasha.CSharp/Compiler/CompileUnit/AssemblyCSharpBuilder.CompileOption.cssrc/Natasha.CSharp/Compiler/CompileUnit/Configuration/DebugConfiguration.cssrc/Natasha.CSharp/HotExecutor/ReCompile/HECompiler.cs
Ensure all deprecated methods are replaced with their updated counterparts and review CHANGELOG.md for migration guidelines.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify API changes and consider documenting configuration choices
The builder configuration has undergone significant changes:
- New method calls (
GetException,UseRandomLoadContext) - Changed from
WithDebugPlusCompiletoWithDebugCompile - Switched debugger configuration from
ForStandard()toForCore()
Let's verify the API changes and their compatibility:
Consider adding comments explaining:
- Why
ForCore()is preferred overForStandard() - The purpose of
GetException()andUseRandomLoadContext() - When to use
WithFileOutput()(currently commented out)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of the old API to ensure all instances are updated
rg "WithDebugPlusCompile|ForStandard\(\)" --type cs
# Look for any migration guides or breaking changes documentation
fd "BREAKING|CHANGELOG|MIGRATION" -e md
Length of output: 826
| public class NatashaSlimMethodBuilder(string script) | ||
| { | ||
| public readonly AssemblyCSharpBuilder Builder; | ||
| public readonly string Script; | ||
| public readonly HashSet<string> Usings; | ||
| private HashSet<string>? _exceptUsings; | ||
| public readonly AssemblyCSharpBuilder Builder = new(); | ||
| public readonly string Script = script; | ||
| public readonly HashSet<string> Usings = []; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation for the script parameter.
The class performs dynamic code generation without validating the input script. This could pose security risks if malicious code is provided.
Consider adding validation:
public class NatashaSlimMethodBuilder(string script)
{
+ static void ValidateScript(string script)
+ {
+ if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(script))
+ throw new ArgumentException("Script cannot be null or empty", nameof(script));
+ // Add additional validation rules as needed
+ }
+
public readonly AssemblyCSharpBuilder Builder = new();
- public readonly string Script = script;
+ public readonly string Script = ValidateScript(script);
public readonly HashSet<string> Usings = [];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public class NatashaSlimMethodBuilder(string script) | |
| { | |
| public readonly AssemblyCSharpBuilder Builder; | |
| public readonly string Script; | |
| public readonly HashSet<string> Usings; | |
| private HashSet<string>? _exceptUsings; | |
| public readonly AssemblyCSharpBuilder Builder = new(); | |
| public readonly string Script = script; | |
| public readonly HashSet<string> Usings = []; | |
| public class NatashaSlimMethodBuilder | |
| { | |
| private static void ValidateScript(string script) | |
| { | |
| if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(script)) | |
| throw new ArgumentException("Script cannot be null or empty", nameof(script)); | |
| // Add additional validation rules as needed | |
| } | |
| public readonly AssemblyCSharpBuilder Builder = new(); | |
| public readonly string Script; | |
| public readonly HashSet<string> Usings = []; | |
| public NatashaSlimMethodBuilder(string script) | |
| { | |
| ValidateScript(script); | |
| Script = script; | |
| } |
| dllStream.Dispose(); | ||
| pdbStream?.Dispose(); | ||
| xmlStream?.Dispose(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve resource management with using statements
While moving stream disposal right after compilation is good, consider using using statements to ensure proper resource cleanup even in case of exceptions.
-Stream dllStream;
-Stream? pdbStream = null;
-Stream? xmlStream = null;
+using Stream dllStream = DllFilePath != string.Empty
+ ? File.Create(FileHandle(DllFilePath))
+ : new MemoryStream();
+using Stream? pdbStream = null;
+using Stream? xmlStream = null;
if (DllFilePath != string.Empty)
{
- dllStream = File.Create(FileHandle(DllFilePath));
}
-else
-{
- dllStream = new MemoryStream();
-}
if (CommentFilePath != string.Empty)
{
- xmlStream = File.Create(FileHandle(CommentFilePath));
+ xmlStream = File.Create(FileHandle(CommentFilePath));
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| dllStream.Dispose(); | ||
| xmlStream?.Dispose(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dllStream.Dispose(); | ||
| pdbStream?.Dispose(); | ||
| xmlStream?.Dispose(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential use of disposed stream and improve resource management
There are several issues with the current stream disposal implementation:
- In the success path,
dllStreamis disposed beforeLoadAssemblyFromStreamuses it - Stream disposal code is duplicated between success and failure paths
- Resource cleanup might not happen if an exception occurs
Consider restructuring the code to use using statements and ensure proper stream lifecycle:
-Stream dllStream;
-Stream? pdbStream = null;
-Stream? xmlStream = null;
+using Stream dllStream = DllFilePath != string.Empty
+ ? File.Create(FileHandle(DllFilePath))
+ : new MemoryStream();
+using Stream? pdbStream = null;
+using Stream? xmlStream = null;
// ... compilation code ...
if (compileResult.Success)
{
dllStream.Position = 0;
- pdbStream?.Dispose();
assembly = Domain.LoadAssemblyFromStream(dllStream, null);
LoadContext!.LoadMetadataWithAssembly(assembly);
CompileSucceedEvent?.Invoke(_compilation, assembly!);
- dllStream.Dispose();
- xmlStream?.Dispose();
}
else
{
- dllStream.Dispose();
- pdbStream?.Dispose();
- xmlStream?.Dispose();
CompileFailedEvent?.Invoke(_compilation, compileResult.Diagnostics);
_exception = NatashaExceptionAnalyzer.GetCompileException(_compilation, compileResult.Diagnostics);
throw _exception;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| dllStream.Dispose(); | |
| xmlStream?.Dispose(); | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| dllStream.Dispose(); | |
| pdbStream?.Dispose(); | |
| xmlStream?.Dispose(); | |
| using Stream dllStream = DllFilePath != string.Empty | |
| ? File.Create(FileHandle(DllFilePath)) | |
| : new MemoryStream(); | |
| using Stream? pdbStream = null; | |
| using Stream? xmlStream = null; | |
| // ... compilation code ... | |
| if (compileResult.Success) | |
| { | |
| dllStream.Position = 0; | |
| assembly = Domain.LoadAssemblyFromStream(dllStream, null); | |
| LoadContext!.LoadMetadataWithAssembly(assembly); | |
| CompileSucceedEvent?.Invoke(_compilation, assembly!); | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| CompileFailedEvent?.Invoke(_compilation, compileResult.Diagnostics); | |
| _exception = NatashaExceptionAnalyzer.GetCompileException(_compilation, compileResult.Diagnostics); | |
| throw _exception; | |
| } |
| @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ public static class HEProxy | |||
| private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, SyntaxTree> _fileSyntaxTreeCache = new(); | |||
| private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, HashSet<string>> _cs0104UsingCache = new(); | |||
| //private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, CSharpParseOptions?> _mixOPLCommentCache = new(); | |||
| private static readonly object _runLock = new object(); | |||
| private static readonly object _runLock = new(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
C# language version set to preview
All projects are using LangVersion set to preview. It's recommended to specify a stable version like 12.0 to ensure compatibility and stability.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify C# language version compatibility
The code uses C# 12.0 features like collection expressions [] and simplified object initialization new(). While this makes the code more concise, ensure that:
- The project's language version is set to support C# 12.0
- All developers and build environments are compatible with this version
Also applies to: 23-23, 35-35, 36-36, 37-37
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check project language version settings
rg -l "LangVersion" --glob "**/*.csproj"
Length of output: 749
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Extract LangVersion values from csproj files
rg -H "LangVersion" --glob "**/*.csproj" | awk -F '>' '{print $2}' | awk -F '<' '{print $1}'
Length of output: 196
| @@ -225,7 +219,7 @@ Project("{9A19103F-16F7-4668-BE54-9A1E7A4F7556}") = "Natasha.CSharp.UnitTest.Bas | |||
| EndProject | |||
| Project("{9A19103F-16F7-4668-BE54-9A1E7A4F7556}") = "RefAssembly", "test\ut\Compile\RefAssembly\RefAssembly.csproj", "{67BBDAD5-AFE1-4371-A5CA-C05242A28542}" | |||
| EndProject | |||
| Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") = "MemAssembly", "test\ut\Compile\MemAssembly\MemAssembly.csproj", "{AC2E37E8-A930-4092-BA9D-2CCC2E895E5D}" | |||
| Project("{9A19103F-16F7-4668-BE54-9A1E7A4F7556}") = "MemAssembly", "test\ut\Compile\MemAssembly\MemAssembly.csproj", "{AC2E37E8-A930-4092-BA9D-2CCC2E895E5D}" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Duplicate GUIDs detected in Natasha.sln. Ensure each project has a unique GUID and verify consistency across all project files.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify GUID consistency across solution.
The GUIDs for MemAssembly and WebapiWIthController projects have been updated. While the changes look correct, it's important to ensure these GUIDs are unique across the solution and match with their respective project files.
Also applies to: 262-263
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for GUID uniqueness and consistency
# Test: Extract all GUIDs and check for duplicates
rg -o "[A-F0-9]{8}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{12}" | sort | uniq -d
# Test: Verify GUIDs in project files match solution
fd -e csproj | xargs grep -l "ProjectGuid"
Length of output: 4932
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Count total and unique GUIDs in Natasha.sln
# Test: Compare total GUIDs with unique GUIDs to identify duplicates
rg -o "[A-F0-9]{8}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{12}" Natasha.sln | wc -l
rg -o "[A-F0-9]{8}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{12}" Natasha.sln | sort | uniq | wc -l
Length of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GUIDs in project files match those in Natasha.sln
# Test: Extract GUIDs from .csproj files and compare with solution GUIDs
solution_guids=$(rg -o "[A-F0-9]{8}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{4}-[A-F0-9]{12}" Natasha.sln)
proj_guids=$(fd -e csproj | xargs grep -o "ProjectGuid\s*=\s*\"[A-F0-9\-]*\"" | grep -o "[A-F0-9\-]*")
missing_in_proj=$(comm -23 <(echo "$solution_guids" | sort) <(echo "$proj_guids" | sort))
missing_in_sol=$(comm -13 <(echo "$solution_guids" | sort) <(echo "$proj_guids" | sort))
echo "GUIDs in solution but not in projects:"
echo "$missing_in_proj"
echo "GUIDs in projects but not in solution:"
echo "$missing_in_sol"
Length of output: 66558
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
NETCore3.0andConsoleSample.Bug Fixes
HotExecutemethod for better reporting.Documentation
HotExecutorextension, detailing execution and debugging features.Refactor
HEProxyandNatashaSlimMethodBuilder.Chores